Meadan Hedda, Lee James D, Chung Moon Y
Department of Special Education, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, 1310 South Sixth Street, Champaign, IL 61820 USA.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA USA.
Curr Dev Disord Rep. 2022;9(4):213-219. doi: 10.1007/s40474-022-00259-z. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
Parent-implemented autism interventions are considered empirically validated interventions and the use of telepractice in these interventions is reported as effective. However, little is known about the social validity assessments and outcomes of these interventions. The purpose of this review is to explore the current practices of conducting social validity assessment and reporting its outcomes within parent-implemented telepractice autism interventions.
The 11 reviewed studies included caregivers as participants, telepractice intervention focusing on social communication outcomes of young autistic children, and were published in a peer-reviewed journal within the past five years.
The researchers in the reviewed articles reported positive outcomes for parent-implemented telepractice autism interventions. Notably, however, information about social validity assessments of the interventions was limited. Researchers are encouraged to evaluate the social validity of interventions using multiple data sources and methods, and report on their findings as they relate to other types of data.
家长实施的自闭症干预措施被认为是经过实证验证的干预措施，并且据报道在这些干预措施中使用远程医疗是有效的。然而，对于这些干预措施的社会效度评估及其结果却知之甚少。本综述的目的是探讨在家长实施的远程医疗自闭症干预措施中进行社会效度评估并报告其结果的当前做法。
所审查的11项研究将照顾者作为参与者，远程医疗干预侧重于幼儿自闭症的社交沟通结果，并且在过去五年内发表于同行评审期刊。
所审查文章中的研究人员报告了家长实施的远程医疗自闭症干预措施的积极结果。然而，值得注意的是，关于这些干预措施的社会效度评估的信息有限。鼓励研究人员使用多种数据来源和方法评估干预措施的社会效度，并报告与其他类型数据相关的研究结果。
