Urogynecology Early-Career Peer Reviewer Academy.

Suppr

超能文献

作者信息

Brubaker Linda

机构信息

From the University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA.

出版信息

Urogynecology (Phila). 2022 Dec 1;28(12):795-796. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001291.

DOI:10.1097/SPV.0000000000001291

PMID:36409635

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

Urogynecology Early-Career Peer Reviewer Academy.

Urogynecology (Phila). 2022 Dec 1;28(12):795-796. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001291.

Ranking versus rating in peer review of research grant applications.

PLoS One. 2023 Oct 5;18(10):e0292306. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292306. eCollection 2023.

The Launch of the Urogynecology Early Career Peer Reviewer Academy.

Urogynecology (Phila). 2023 Sep 1;29(9):717-718. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001405.

Introducing the SURGERY Peer Review Academies.

Surgery. 2023 May;173(5):1111-1112. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.03.010.

Do funding applications where peer reviewers disagree have higher citations? A cross-sectional study.

F1000Res. 2018 Jul 9;7:1030. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.15479.2. eCollection 2018.

CIHR critics defend face-to-face peer review.

CMAJ. 2017 Apr 3;189(13):E513. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1095405.

Unique Review Criteria and Patient and Stakeholder Reviewers: Analysis of PCORI's Approach to Research Funding.

Value Health. 2018 Oct;21(10):1152-1160. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.03.017. Epub 2018 Jun 8.

Choosing and succeeding in academic medicine: advice for students, trainees, and junior faculty.

Transl Res. 2016 Nov;177:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2016.06.004. Epub 2016 Jun 16.

Italy widens peer review of health research.

Nature. 1995 Mar 23;374(6520):299. doi: 10.1038/374299a0.

Institutes experiment with a variety of different appeal processes.

Nat Med. 2012 Sep;18(9):1313. doi: 10.1038/nm0912-1313.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验

相似文献

Urogynecology Early-Career Peer Reviewer Academy.

Urogynecology (Phila). 2022 Dec 1;28(12):795-796. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001291.

Ranking versus rating in peer review of research grant applications.

PLoS One. 2023 Oct 5;18(10):e0292306. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292306. eCollection 2023.

The Launch of the Urogynecology Early Career Peer Reviewer Academy.

Urogynecology (Phila). 2023 Sep 1;29(9):717-718. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001405.

Introducing the SURGERY Peer Review Academies.

Surgery. 2023 May;173(5):1111-1112. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.03.010.

Do funding applications where peer reviewers disagree have higher citations? A cross-sectional study.

F1000Res. 2018 Jul 9;7:1030. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.15479.2. eCollection 2018.

CIHR critics defend face-to-face peer review.

CMAJ. 2017 Apr 3;189(13):E513. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1095405.

Unique Review Criteria and Patient and Stakeholder Reviewers: Analysis of PCORI's Approach to Research Funding.

Value Health. 2018 Oct;21(10):1152-1160. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.03.017. Epub 2018 Jun 8.

Choosing and succeeding in academic medicine: advice for students, trainees, and junior faculty.

Transl Res. 2016 Nov;177:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2016.06.004. Epub 2016 Jun 16.

Italy widens peer review of health research.

Nature. 1995 Mar 23;374(6520):299. doi: 10.1038/374299a0.

Institutes experiment with a variety of different appeal processes.

Nat Med. 2012 Sep;18(9):1313. doi: 10.1038/nm0912-1313.