CUNY-Brooklyn College and the Graduate Center, New York, NY, USA.
School of Government, Ateneo de Manila University, Manila, Philippines.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Mar;30(11):29369-29379. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-24178-z. Epub 2022 Nov 22.
We analyze how the mergers and acquisitions (M&As) and greenfield foreign direct investment (GFDI) outflows impact the host countries' air pollution at the sectoral level. Following the recent advent of multinationals from emerging economies, we examine outflows rather than inflows. Evidence indicates that there are important distinctive effects of FDI mode of exit. GFDI outflows benefit the environment in the full sample and developing countries, supporting the reverse-pollution haven hypothesis, and at the industry level in the electrical power industry and building. The positive impact of M&A outflows on the environment is revealed only when data is disaggregated further into the industry level in the transport industry of developed economies and the electrical power industry of developing countries. We find that heterogeneities caused by countries' development levels and the FDI's two exit modes, M&As deteriorate the environment less than GFDI.
我们分析了并购(M&A)和绿地外国直接投资(GFDI)流出如何对东道国的部门层面的空气污染产生影响。随着新兴经济体的跨国公司的出现,我们考察的是流出而不是流入。证据表明,FDI 退出模式存在重要的区别。在全样本和发展中国家中,GFDI 流出有利于环境,支持反向污染避难所假说,在电力和建筑行业也是如此。只有当数据进一步细分到发达经济体的运输业和发展中国家的电力行业的行业层面时,才会显示出 M&A 流出对环境的积极影响。我们发现,由国家发展水平和 FDI 的两种退出模式引起的异质性,即 M&A,对环境的破坏程度小于 GFDI。