Greenwald Andrew S, Hauw-Berlemont Caroline, Shan Mingxu, Wang Shuang, Yip Natalie, Kurlansky Paul, Argenziano Michael, Bennett Bridgette, Langone Danielle, Moitra Vivek
Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY.
Department of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY.
Crit Care Explor. 2022 Nov 18;4(11):e0802. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000802. eCollection 2022 Nov.
To assess the impact of a mechanical ventilation quality improvement program on patients who were excluded from the intervention.
Before-during-and-after implementation interrupted time series analysis to assess the effect of the intervention between coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery patients (included) and left-sided valve surgery patients (excluded).
Academic medical center.
Patients undergoing CABG and left-sided valve procedures were analyzed.
A postoperative mechanical ventilation quality improvement program was developed for patients undergoing CABG.
Patients undergoing CABG had a median mechanical ventilation time of 11 hours during P0 ("before" phase) and 6.22 hours during P2 ("after" phase; < 0.001). A spillover effect was observed because mechanical ventilation times also decreased from 10 hours during P0 to 6 hours during P2 among valve patients who were excluded from the protocol ( < 0.001). The interrupted time series analysis demonstrated a significant level of change for ventilation time from P0 to P2 for both CABG ( < 0.0001) and valve patients ( < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in the slope of change between the CABG and valve patient populations across time cohorts (P0 vs P1 [ = 0.8809]; P1 vs P2 [ = 0.3834]; P0 vs P2 [ = 0.7672]), which suggests that the rate of change in mechanical ventilation times was similar between included and excluded patients.
Decreased mechanical ventilation times for patients who were not included in a protocol suggests a spillover effect of quality improvement and demonstrates that quality improvement can have benefits beyond a target population.
评估机械通气质量改进计划对被排除在干预措施之外的患者的影响。
实施前-实施期间-实施后中断时间序列分析,以评估该干预措施对冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)患者(纳入)和左侧瓣膜手术患者(排除)的效果。
学术医疗中心。
对接受CABG和左侧瓣膜手术的患者进行分析。
为接受CABG的患者制定了术后机械通气质量改进计划。
接受CABG的患者在P0阶段(“之前”阶段)的机械通气时间中位数为11小时,在P2阶段(“之后”阶段)为6.22小时(<0.001)。观察到了溢出效应,因为被排除在方案之外的瓣膜手术患者的机械通气时间也从P0阶段的10小时减少到了P2阶段的6小时(<0.001)。中断时间序列分析表明,CABG患者(<0.0001)和瓣膜手术患者(<0.0001)从P0到P2的通气时间都有显著变化。在不同时间队列中,CABG患者群体和瓣膜手术患者群体之间的变化斜率没有显著差异(P0与P1比较[=0.8809];P1与P2比较[=0.3834];P0与P2比较[=0.7672]),这表明纳入和未纳入的患者之间机械通气时间的变化率相似。
未纳入方案的患者机械通气时间减少表明质量改进存在溢出效应,并证明质量改进对目标人群之外的患者也有益处。