Department of Orthopaedics, Zigong Fourth People's Hospital, Zigong, China.
Institute of Digital Medicine, Zigong Academy of Big Data for Medical Science and Artificial Intelligence, Zigong, China.
Orthop Surg. 2023 Jan;15(1):337-346. doi: 10.1111/os.13585. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
Posterior pelvic ring sacroiliac screws are preferred by clinicians for their good biomechanical performance. However, there are few studies on mechanical analysis and intraoperative screw insertion of the dysplastic sacrum and sacroiliac screw. This study investigated the biomechanical performance of oblique sacroiliac screws (OSS) in S1 combined with transiliac-transsacral screws (TTSs) in S2 for pelvic fracture or sacroiliac dislocation with dysplastic sacrum and evaluated the safety of screw placement assisted by the navigation template.
Six models were established, including one OSS fixation in the S2 segment, one transverse sacroiliac screw (TSS) fixation in the S2 segment, one TTS fixation in the S2 segment, one OSS fixation in the S1 and S2 segments, one OSS fixation in the S1 segment and one TSS fixation in the S2 segment, one OSS fixation in the S1 segment and one TTS fixation in the S2 segment. Then, finite element analysis (FEA) was performed. Twelve dysplastic sacrum patients with pelvis fracture or sacroiliac dislocation underwent OSS insertion in the S1 combined with TTS insertion in the S2 under the assistance of the patient-specific locked navigation template. Grading and Matta scores were evaluated after surgery.
In the one-screw fixation group, the vertical displacements of the sacrum surface of S2 OSS, S2 TSS and S2 TTS were 1.23, 1.42, and 1.22 mm, respectively, and the maximum stress of screw were 139.45 MPa, 144.81 MPa, 126.14 MPa, respectively. In the two-screw fixation group, the vertical displacements of the sacrum surface of the S1 OSS + S2 OSS, S1 OSS + S2 TSS and S1 OSS + S2 TTS were 0.91, 1.06, and 0.75 mm, respectively, and the maximum stress of screw were 149.26 MPa, 167.13 Pa, 136.76 MPa, respectively. Clinically, a total of 12 TTS and OSS were inserted under the assistance of navigation templates, with a surgical time of 55 ± 7.69 min, bleeding of 57.5 ± 18.15 ml and radiation times of 14.5 ± 4.95. One of the TTS and one of the OSS were grade 1, and the other screws were grade 0. The Matta scores of nine patients were excellent, and three patents were good.
OSS in the S1 combined with TTS in the S2 had the best mechanical stability in six models, and it is safe for screw insertion assisted by the patient-specific locked navigation template.
临床医生更喜欢使用后路骨盆环骶髂螺钉,因为其具有良好的生物力学性能。然而,对于发育不良骶骨的机械分析和术中螺钉插入以及骶髂螺钉的研究较少。本研究探讨了发育不良骶骨骨盆骨折或骶髂关节脱位患者 S1 中斜置骶髂螺钉(OSS)与 S2 中经髂骨-经骶骨螺钉(TTS)联合固定的生物力学性能,并评估了导航模板辅助下螺钉放置的安全性。
建立了 6 个模型,包括 S2 段的 1 个 OSS 固定、S2 段的 1 个横向骶髂螺钉(TSS)固定、S2 段的 1 个 TTS 固定、S1 和 S2 段的 1 个 OSS 固定、S1 段的 1 个 OSS 固定和 S2 段的 1 个 TSS 固定、S1 段的 1 个 OSS 固定和 S2 段的 1 个 TTS 固定。然后进行有限元分析(FEA)。12 例骨盆骨折或骶髂关节脱位的发育不良骶骨患者在患者特定锁定导航模板的辅助下,行 S1 中 OSS 插入和 S2 中 TTS 插入。术后进行分级和 Matta 评分评估。
在单螺钉固定组中,S2 OSS、S2 TSS 和 S2 TTS 骶骨表面的垂直位移分别为 1.23、1.42 和 1.22mm,螺钉的最大应力分别为 139.45MPa、144.81MPa 和 126.14MPa。在双螺钉固定组中,S1 OSS+S2 OSS、S1 OSS+S2 TSS 和 S1 OSS+S2 TTS 的 S1 骶骨表面的垂直位移分别为 0.91、1.06 和 0.75mm,螺钉的最大应力分别为 149.26MPa、167.13Pa 和 136.76MPa。临床上,在导航模板的辅助下共插入 12 个 TTS 和 OSS,手术时间为 55±7.69min,出血量为 57.5±18.15ml,辐射时间为 14.5±4.95。1 个 TTS 和 1 个 OSS 为 1 级,其余螺钉为 0 级。9 例 Matta 评分优秀,3 例良好。
在 6 个模型中,S1 中的 OSS 联合 S2 中的 TTS 具有最佳的机械稳定性,并且在患者特定锁定导航模板辅助下插入螺钉是安全的。