Suppr超能文献

按护理需求水平划分的按服务收费医疗保险受益人的护理可及性和护理满意度。

Access to care and satisfaction with care among fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries by level of care need.

作者信息

Park Sungchul, Chung Wankyo, Stimpson Jim P

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, College of Health Science, Korea University, 145 Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02841, Republic of Korea; BK21 FOUR R&E Center for Learning Health Systems, Korea University, 145 Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02841, Republic of Korea.

Department of Public Health Science, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Disabil Health J. 2023 Apr;16(2):101402. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2022.101402. Epub 2022 Nov 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Variation among fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare beneficiaries by level of care need for access to care and satisfaction with care is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

We examined access to care and satisfaction with care among FFS Medicare beneficiaries by level of care need.

METHODS

We employed a cross-sectional study design. Using the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey, we categorized 17,967 FFS Medicare beneficiaries into six groups based on level of care need: the relatively healthy (11.0%), those with simple chronic conditions (26.1%), those with minor complex chronic conditions (28.6%), those with major complex chronic conditions (14.2%), the frail (6.2%), and the non-elderly disabled or end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (13.9%). Outcome measures included multiple indicators for access to care and satisfaction with care. For each outcome, we conducted a linear probability model while adjusting for individual-level and county-level characteristics and estimated the adjusted value of the outcome by level of care need.

RESULTS

The non-elderly disabled or ESRD were more likely to experience limited access to care and poor satisfaction with care than other five care need groups. Particularly, the rates of reporting trouble accessing needed medical care were the highest among the non-elderly disabled or ESRD (12.4% [95% CI: 9.6-15.3] vs. 2.1 [95% CI: 1.5-2.8] to 2.5 [95% CI: 1.6-3.5]). The leading reason for trouble accessing needed care among the non-elderly disabled or ESRD was attributable to affordability (59.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Policymakers need to develop targeted approaches to improve access to care and satisfaction with care for the non-elderly with a disability or ESRD.

摘要

背景

按医疗需求水平划分的按服务收费(FFS)医疗保险受益人群体在获得医疗服务和对医疗服务满意度方面的差异尚不清楚。

目的

我们按医疗需求水平研究了FFS医疗保险受益人群体的医疗服务可及性和对医疗服务的满意度。

方法

我们采用横断面研究设计。利用医疗保险当前受益人调查,我们根据医疗需求水平将17967名FFS医疗保险受益人分为六组:相对健康组(11.0%)、患有简单慢性病组(26.1%)、患有轻度复杂慢性病组(28.6%)、患有重度复杂慢性病组(14.2%)、体弱组(6.2%)以及非老年残疾或终末期肾病(ESRD)组(13.9%)。结果指标包括多个医疗服务可及性和对医疗服务满意度的指标。对于每个结果,我们进行了线性概率模型分析,同时调整了个体水平和县级特征,并按医疗需求水平估计了结果的调整值。

结果

与其他五个医疗需求组相比,非老年残疾或ESRD患者更有可能面临医疗服务可及性受限和对医疗服务满意度低的情况。特别是,在非老年残疾或ESRD患者中,报告获取所需医疗服务困难的比例最高(12.4% [95% CI:9.6 - 15.3],而其他组为2.1 [95% CI:1.5 - 2.8]至2.5 [95% CI:1.6 - 3.5])。非老年残疾或ESRD患者获取所需医疗服务困难的主要原因是费用负担能力(59.6%)。

结论

政策制定者需要制定有针对性的方法,以改善残疾或ESRD非老年人的医疗服务可及性和对医疗服务的满意度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验