Suppr超能文献

少数民族服务机构全日制本科生的粮食安全状况与心理困扰和孤独感之间的关系。

The Association between Food Security Status and Psychological Distress and Loneliness among Full-Time Undergraduate Students at a Minority-Serving Institution.

机构信息

School of Exercise and Nutritional Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182-7251, USA.

Well-Being & Health Promotion Department, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182-4705, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 18;19(22):15245. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192215245.

Abstract

Little is known about the relationship of food security (FS) status with mental health among students at minority-serving institutions. We aimed to elucidate the association of FS status with psychological distress and loneliness among full-time undergraduate students at a minority-serving institution. We used data from the National Collegiate Health Assessment III (n = 441). To assess FS, students responded to the USDA 6-item short form (range: 0-6) and responses were categorized as high (0), marginal (1) or low/very low (2-6) FS. The Kessler 6 scale assessed psychological distress (range: 0-24). The UCLA loneliness scale assessed loneliness (range: 3-9). Higher scores indicated higher psychological distress and loneliness. Using adjusted linear regression models, we examined the association of FS with psychological distress and loneliness. Compared to students with high FS (mean (SD): 9.4 (0.8)), students with marginal (11.4 (1.0); < 0.05) or low/very low (11.8 (0.8); < 0.01) FS had higher psychological distress scores. Compared to students with high FS (5.5 (0.3)), students with low/very low FS (6.0 (0.3); < 0.05) had higher loneliness scores. Future studies should further explore these relationships using mixed methods, to provide complementary quantitative findings with the emic perspective of students and their experiences, which can inform programming to prevent and reduce food insecurity.

摘要

人们对粮食安全状况与少数民族服务机构学生心理健康之间的关系知之甚少。我们旨在阐明粮食安全状况与少数民族服务机构全日制本科生心理困扰和孤独感之间的关系。我们使用了国家大学生健康评估第三期(n = 441)的数据。为了评估粮食安全状况,学生们回答了美国农业部的 6 项简短形式问题(范围:0-6),并将回答分为高(0)、边缘(1)或低/极低(2-6)粮食安全状况。凯斯勒 6 项量表评估了心理困扰(范围:0-24)。加州大学洛杉矶分校孤独量表评估了孤独感(范围:3-9)。得分越高表示心理困扰和孤独感越高。使用调整后的线性回归模型,我们研究了粮食安全状况与心理困扰和孤独感之间的关系。与粮食安全状况高的学生(平均(SD):9.4(0.8))相比,粮食安全状况边缘(11.4(1.0);<0.05)或低/极低(11.8(0.8);<0.01)的学生心理困扰得分更高。与粮食安全状况高的学生(5.5(0.3))相比,粮食安全状况低/极低的学生(6.0(0.3);<0.05)孤独感得分更高。未来的研究应该使用混合方法进一步探讨这些关系,提供补充的定量发现,以及学生及其经历的本土观点,这可以为预防和减少粮食不安全的计划提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17d5/9690574/c942fed95b4b/ijerph-19-15245-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验