Schaufler Christian, Kaul Sumedh, Fleishman Aaron, Korets Ruslan, Chang Peter, Wagner Andrew, Kim Simon, Bellmunt Joaquim, Kaplan Irving, Olumi Aria F, Gershman Boris
Division of Urologic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2024 Mar;27(1):81-88. doi: 10.1038/s41391-022-00619-1. Epub 2022 Nov 25.
The optimal management of node-positive (pN1) prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy (RP) remains uncertain. Despite randomized evidence, utilization of immediate, life-long androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) remains poor, and recent trials of early salvage radiotherapy included only a minority of pN1 patients. We therefore emulated a hypothetical pragmatic trial of adjuvant radiotherapy versus observation in men with pN1 prostate cancer.
Using the RADICALS-RT trial to inform the design of a hypothetical trial, we identified men aged 50-69 years with pT2-3 Rany pN1 M0, pre-treatment PSA < 50 ng/mL prostate cancer in the NCDB from 2006 to 2015 treated with 60-72 Gy of adjuvant RT (aRT) ± ADT within 26 weeks of RP or observation. After estimating a propensity score for receipt of aRT, we estimated absolute and relative treatment effects using stabilized inverse probability of treatment (sIPW) re-weighting.
In total, 3510 patients were included in the study, of whom 587 (17%) received aRT (73% with concurrent ADT). Median follow-up was 40.0 -months, during which 333 deaths occurred. After sIPW re-weighting, baseline characteristics were well-balanced. Adjusted overall survival (OS) was 93% versus 89% at 5-years and 82% versus 79% at 7-years for aRT versus observation (p = 0.11). In IPW-reweighted Cox regression, aRT was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality (ACM) than observation, but this did not reach statistical significance (HR 0.70 p = 0.06). In analyses examining heterogeneity of treatment effects, aRT was associated with improved ACM only for men with Gleason 8-10 disease (HR 0.59, p = 0.01), ≥2 positive LNs (HR 0.49, p = 0.04 for 2 positive LNs; HR 0.42, p = 0.01 for ≥3 positive LNs), or negative surgical margins (HR 0.50, p = 0.02).
In observational analyses designed to emulate a hypothetical target trial of aRT versus observation in pN1 prostate cancer, aRT was associated with improved OS only for men with Gleason 8-10 disease, ≥2 positive LNs, or negative surgical margins.
根治性前列腺切除术后(RP)淋巴结阳性(pN1)前列腺癌的最佳治疗方案仍不确定。尽管有随机对照证据,但立即进行终身雄激素剥夺治疗(ADT)的应用率仍然很低,并且最近早期挽救性放疗试验仅纳入了少数pN1患者。因此,我们模拟了一项关于pN1前列腺癌患者辅助放疗与观察的假设性实用试验。
利用RADICALS-RT试验为假设性试验的设计提供信息,我们从2006年至2015年的国家癌症数据库(NCDB)中识别出年龄在50-69岁、pT2-3 Rany pN1 M0、治疗前PSA<50 ng/mL的前列腺癌患者,这些患者在RP后26周内接受了60-72 Gy的辅助放疗(aRT)±ADT或观察。在估计接受aRT的倾向评分后,我们使用稳定的逆概率治疗(sIPW)重新加权来估计绝对和相对治疗效果。
该研究共纳入3510例患者,其中587例(17%)接受了aRT(73%同时接受ADT)。中位随访时间为40.0个月,在此期间发生了333例死亡。经过sIPW重新加权后,基线特征得到了很好的平衡。aRT组与观察组的5年调整总生存率(OS)分别为93%和89%,7年分别为82%和79%(p = 0.11)。在IPW重新加权的Cox回归分析中,aRT与全因死亡率(ACM)风险低于观察组相关,但未达到统计学意义(HR 0.70,p = 0.06)。在检查治疗效果异质性的分析中,aRT仅与Gleason 8-10疾病患者(HR 0.59,p = 0.01)、≥2个阳性淋巴结患者(2个阳性淋巴结时HR 0.49,p = 0.04;≥3个阳性淋巴结时HR 0.42,p = 0.01)或手术切缘阴性患者(HR 0.50,p = 0.02)的ACM改善相关。
在旨在模拟pN1前列腺癌aRT与观察的假设目标试验的观察性分析中,aRT仅与Gleason 8-10疾病、≥2个阳性淋巴结或手术切缘阴性的男性患者的OS改善相关。