Children's Health and Exercise Research Centre, Sport and Health Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, EX1 2LU, Exeter, UK.
Bristol Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
BMC Public Health. 2022 Nov 24;22(1):2172. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14551-5.
Public health guidelines for children advocate physical activity (PA) and the restriction of continuous sedentary time. Schools offer an attractive setting for health promotion, however school-based interventions to increase PA typically fail, and primary school children may spend most of the school day sitting down. Classroom movement breaks have been identified as an attractive opportunity to address this concern and may positively influence behaviour, but little is known about the barriers to implementing movement within lessons from a multi stakeholder perspective. The purpose of this study was to explore (1) the perceptions of primary school pupils, staff members and governors regarding classroom movement breaks, and (2) their perceived barriers and facilitators to implementing PA into the classroom.
Thirty-four pupils (Key Stages 1 and 2, ages 5-7 y) took part in a focus group discussion. Sixty-four staff members and twenty governors completed a questionnaire and an optional follow up semi-structured telephone interview. Qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis.
Pupils, staff members and governors expressed an enthusiasm for movement breaks provided that they were short, simple, pupil-guided and performed at the discretion of the teacher. Time and concerns regarding transitioning back to work following a movement break were identified as key barriers by pupils and staff. Governors and some staff expressed that favourable evidence for movement breaks is needed to facilitate their adoption, particularly regarding the potential for improvements in cognitive functioning or classroom behaviour.
There is a wide appeal for classroom-based activity breaks, when delivered in a manner that is not disruptive. Future research which examines the potential benefits of such activity breaks is warranted.
儿童公共卫生指南提倡身体活动(PA)和限制连续久坐时间。学校为健康促进提供了一个有吸引力的环境,但基于学校的干预措施通常无法增加 PA,而且小学生可能大部分时间都坐在教室里。课堂运动休息已被确定为解决这一问题的一个有吸引力的机会,可能会对行为产生积极影响,但从多利益相关者的角度来看,很少有人了解在课堂中实施运动的障碍。本研究的目的是探讨(1)小学生、教职员工和校长对课堂运动休息的看法,以及(2)他们对在课堂中实施 PA 的障碍和促进因素的看法。
34 名小学生(关键阶段 1 和 2,年龄 5-7 岁)参加了焦点小组讨论。64 名教职员工和 20 名校长完成了一份问卷,并可选地进行了后续的半结构化电话访谈。使用主题分析对定性数据进行分析。
小学生、教职员工和校长对短时间、简单、以学生为导向、由教师自行决定的运动休息表示欢迎。学生和教职员工认为时间和对运动休息后重新回到工作状态的担忧是关键障碍。校长和一些教职员工表示,需要有利的证据来促进运动休息的采用,特别是关于改善认知功能或课堂行为的潜力。
课堂活动休息受到广泛欢迎,只要不会造成干扰。需要进一步研究这种活动休息的潜在益处。