Nuez Aarón, Padrón Iván, Reyes-Moreno Cristian, Marrero Hipólito
Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales, Psicología, Universidad Tecnológica del Perú, Lima, Peru.
Instituto Universitario de Neurociencias, Universidad de La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Nov 10;16:971051. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.971051. eCollection 2022.
Language describes approach/avoidance intentionality by means of attitudinal verbs (e.g., accept vs. reject). The right superior temporal sulcus (rSTS) has been shown to be recruited in processing action goals and approach intentionality in social contexts. In this study, we examine whether transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of this area improves the processing of attitudinal verbs (either of approach or avoidance) in the context of affirmative and negative sentences [e.g., Julio (did not)/included meat on the grocery list]. After being subjected to tDCS, 46 participants were given sentences for passive reading. Sentences were displayed in segments with a fixed time of exposition, and a verb, either the one mentioned in the sentence or an alternative one was displayed 1,500 ms after the sentence (e.g., included vs. excluded, in the example). Participants were told to read them and then press the space bar to continue the experiment. Results showed shorter latencies for approach verbs that were either mentioned in approach sentences or the alternatives in avoidance sentences, both in affirmative and negative versions under anodal conditions compared to sham conditions. Thus, the anodal stimulation of rSTS affected the accessibility of approach verbs that were not modulated either by being mentioned or by sentence polarity. In addition, mentioned verbs had shorter reading times than the alternative ones in negative sentences in the anodal vs. sham condition. This suggests that stimulation caused an effect of negation in the activation of the mentioned verb. Implications are discussed in the context of the role of the rSTS in processing attitudinal verbs and negation to understand better approach and avoidance mediated by language in the framework of the two-step model of negation processing.
语言通过态度动词(如接受与拒绝)来描述趋近/回避意向。右颞上沟(rSTS)已被证明在处理社会情境中的行动目标和趋近意向时会被激活。在本研究中,我们探究对该区域进行经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)是否能改善在肯定句和否定句情境下(例如,胡里奥(没有)/在购物清单上列出肉类)对态度动词(趋近或回避)的处理。46名参与者在接受tDCS后,进行句子的被动阅读。句子以固定的展示时间分段呈现,在句子出现1500毫秒后展示一个动词,该动词要么是句子中提到的,要么是另一个替代动词(例如,在上述例子中为“包括”与“排除”)。参与者被告知阅读句子,然后按下空格键继续实验。结果显示,与假刺激条件相比,在阳极刺激条件下,无论是肯定句还是否定句中,出现在趋近句中的趋近动词或回避句中的替代趋近动词的反应潜伏期都更短。因此,对rSTS的阳极刺激影响了未因被提及或句子极性而受到调节的趋近动词的可及性。此外,在阳极刺激与假刺激条件下,否定句中被提及的动词的阅读时间比替代动词更短。这表明刺激在被提及动词的激活中产生了否定效应。我们在rSTS在处理态度动词和否定中的作用的背景下讨论了这些结果,以便在否定处理的两步模型框架内更好地理解由语言介导的趋近和回避。