Lei Yan, Lu Xiaolan, Mou Daiyong, Du Qin, Wang Guangrong, Wang Qiang
Department of Clinical Laboratory, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, 637000, Sichuan, China.
Department of Laboratory Medicine, North Sichuan Medical College; Translational Medicine Research Center, North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, 637000, Sichuan, China.
Open Life Sci. 2022 Nov 14;17(1):1487-1496. doi: 10.1515/biol-2022-0512. eCollection 2022.
There have been several false-positive results in the antibody detection of COVID-19. This study aimed to analyze the distribution characteristics of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) immunoglobulin M (IgM) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) in false-positive results using chemiluminescent immunoassay. The characteristics of false-positive results in SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG tests were analyzed. The false-positive proportion of single SARS-CoV-2 IgM-positive results was 95.88%, which was higher than those of single SARS-CoV-2 IgG-positive results (71.05%; < 0.001) and SARS-CoV-2 IgM- and IgG-positive results (39.39%; < 0.001). The S/CO ratios of SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG in false-positive results ranged from 1.0 to 50.0. The false-positive probability of SARS-CoV-2 IgM in the ratios of specimen signals to the cutoff value (S/CO) range (1.0-3.0) was 95.06% (77/81), and the probability of false-positive results of SARS-CoV-2 IgG in the S/CO range (1.0-2.0) was 85.71% (24/28). Dynamic monitoring showed that the S/CO values of IgM in false-positive results decreased or remained unchanged, whereas the S/CO values of IgG in false-positive results decreased. The possibility of false-positive single SARS-CoV-2 IgM-positive and single SARS-CoV-2 IgG-positive results was high. As the value of S/CO ratios decreased, the probability of false-positives consequently increased, especially among the single SARS-CoV-2 IgM-positive results.
新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)抗体检测中存在一些假阳性结果。本研究旨在采用化学发光免疫分析法分析严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)免疫球蛋白M(IgM)和免疫球蛋白G(IgG)在假阳性结果中的分布特征。分析了SARS-CoV-2 IgM和IgG检测中假阳性结果的特征。SARS-CoV-2 IgM单项阳性结果的假阳性比例为95.88%,高于SARS-CoV-2 IgG单项阳性结果(71.05%;P<0.001)和SARS-CoV-2 IgM与IgG双阳性结果(39.39%;P<0.001)。假阳性结果中SARS-CoV-2 IgM和IgG的S/CO比值范围为1.0至50.0。标本信号与临界值比值(S/CO)范围在(1.0 - 3.0)时,SARS-CoV-2 IgM的假阳性概率为95.06%(77/81),S/CO范围在(1.0 - 2.0)时,SARS-CoV-2 IgG假阳性结果的概率为85.71%(24/28)。动态监测显示,假阳性结果中IgM的S/CO值下降或保持不变,而假阳性结果中IgG的S/CO值下降。SARS-CoV-2 IgM单项阳性和SARS-CoV-2 IgG单项阳性结果出现假阳性的可能性较高。随着S/CO比值降低,假阳性概率相应增加,尤其是在SARS-CoV-2 IgM单项阳性结果中。