Department of Clinical Pharmacy, West Virginia University School of Pharmacy, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Department of Pharmacy, Ruby Memorial Hospital, Morgantown, WV, USA.
J Pharm Pract. 2024 Apr;37(2):429-434. doi: 10.1177/08971900221143406. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
Unfractionated heparin (UFH) has traditionally been the agent of choice in patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). However, direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) have recently garnered more attention in ECMO because of their advantages over UFH. Given the heterogeneous results of multiple recent published studies, we performed a meta-analysis to describe pooled outcomes between bivalirudin and UFH anticoagulation in patients on ECMO. Relevant studies were identified from MEDLINE and Google Scholar database searches through April 23, 2022. The primary efficacy outcome was thromboembolism (TE), and secondary efficacy outcomes included all-cause mortality and circuit thrombosis. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding. A total of 6 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Bivalirudin use was associated with significantly lower risk of TE (OR 0.61; 95% CI 0.38-.99; = .05; = 0%) and circuit thrombosis (OR 0.51; 95% CI .32-.80; = .004; = 0%) compared with UFH. There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality risk (OR 0.75; 95% CI .52-1.09; = .13; = 30%) between the bivalirudin and UFH groups. No significant difference in the risk of major bleeding between 2 groups was found (OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.25-1.81; = .43; = 80%). These data support that bivalirudin is a reasonable alternative to UFH in patients on ECMO. Randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm bivalirudin's efficacy and safety results compared with UFH.
普通肝素(UFH)一直是体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)患者的首选药物。然而,由于直接凝血酶抑制剂(DTI)相对于 UFH 的优势,它们最近在 ECMO 中受到了更多关注。鉴于多项近期发表的研究结果存在差异,我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以描述 ECMO 患者中比伐卢定和 UFH 抗凝的汇总结局。相关研究通过 2022 年 4 月 23 日在 MEDLINE 和 Google Scholar 数据库中的搜索进行了鉴定。主要疗效结局是血栓栓塞(TE),次要疗效结局包括全因死亡率和回路血栓形成。主要安全性结局是大出血。共有 6 项研究纳入荟萃分析。与 UFH 相比,比伐卢定的使用与 TE(OR 0.61;95%CI 0.38-0.99; =.05; =.0%)和回路血栓形成(OR 0.51;95%CI 0.32-0.80; =.004; =.0%)的风险显著降低相关。比伐卢定组和 UFH 组的全因死亡率风险无显著差异(OR 0.75;95%CI 0.52-1.09; =.13; =.30%)。两组之间主要出血风险无显著差异(OR 0.67;95%CI 0.25-1.81; =.43; =.80%)。这些数据支持比伐卢定是 ECMO 患者中 UFH 的合理替代药物。需要随机对照试验来证实比伐卢定与 UFH 相比的疗效和安全性结果。