Sandhu Kulwinder Singh, Singh Satinder Pal, Thomas Oshin, Choudhary Priyanka, Singh Arvinder, Singh Manjit
Department of ENT and Head Neck Surgery, GMC, 357, B- Block, New Amritsar, Amritsar, Punjab India.
Department of ENT and Head Neck Surgery, GMC, H. No. 4580, Bhalla Colony, Chheharta, Amritsar, Punjab India.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Oct;74(Suppl 2):863-869. doi: 10.1007/s12070-020-01936-4. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
To study the long term outcome of endoscopic septoplasty with microdebrider assisted inferior turbinoplasty (MAIT) versus medial flap turbinoplasty (MFT). The present study was conducted in the Department of ENT, Government Medical College, Amritsar. Patients with symptomatic persistent nasal obstruction were recruited from ENT outdoor clinics. The nasal obstruction was persistent despite medical therapy that included a minimum 4 weeks. The study was primarily a double blinded prospective randomized control study including 120 patients, where all patients enrolled at odd numbers were taken for endoscopic septoplasty with microdebrider assisted inferior turbinoplasty and all patients with even numbers were taken for endoscopic septoplasty with MFT. Patient-scored nasal obstruction (1-5) along with blindly assessed nasal airway patency ratings (1-4) was done at 3 and 24 months postoperatively. A total of 120 patients were recruited in the study. The mean ages of the MAIT and MFT groups were 28.61 ± 14.8 and 30.25 ± 8.36 years, respectively. Average follow-up period was 21.9 ± 6.3 months. Nasal obstruction was improved in both techniques at 3 months, but after long term follow up, it was highly significant for MFT along with improvement in preoperative symptoms < 0.001. No patients complained of worsening of their obstruction. Nasal patency at 24 months, a significant proportion of patients had a greater nasal assessment by a blind assessor with 97.1% in MFT and 81.9% MAIT with mild to no obstruction. In MAIT group 16.6% had pain/discomfort, 23.6% had discharge which were the major complications, but crusting (MAIT 10% and MFT 3.3%), adhesions (MAIT 13.8% and MFT 1.6%). The medial flap inferior turbinoplasty (MFT) is technically straight forward procedure that provides long term more effective and satisfactory the patient in relieving nasal obstruction, without significant risk of complications. The long term follow up of MAIT is required as there was increase in need of decongestion and they might require second procedure as MFT.
研究使用微型切割器辅助下鼻甲成形术(MAIT)的内镜鼻中隔成形术与内侧瓣下鼻甲成形术(MFT)的长期疗效。本研究在阿姆利则政府医学院耳鼻喉科进行。从耳鼻喉科门诊招募有症状的持续性鼻塞患者。尽管进行了至少4周的药物治疗,鼻塞仍持续存在。该研究主要是一项双盲前瞻性随机对照研究,包括120名患者,其中所有奇数编号的入选患者接受使用微型切割器辅助下鼻甲成形术的内镜鼻中隔成形术,所有偶数编号的患者接受使用MFT的内镜鼻中隔成形术。术后3个月和24个月进行患者评分的鼻塞情况(1 - 5分)以及盲法评估的鼻气道通畅程度评分(1 - 4分)。本研究共招募了120名患者。MAIT组和MFT组的平均年龄分别为28.61±14.8岁和30.25±8.36岁。平均随访期为21.9±6.3个月。两种技术在术后3个月时鼻塞均有改善,但长期随访后,MFT在改善术前症状方面具有高度显著性(<0.001)。没有患者抱怨鼻塞加重。在术后24个月时的鼻通畅情况方面,很大一部分患者经盲法评估鼻状况更佳,MFT组为97.1%,MAIT组为81.9%,鼻塞程度为轻度至无鼻塞。在MAIT组中,16.6%有疼痛/不适,23.6%有分泌物,这是主要并发症,但结痂情况(MAIT为10%,MFT为3.3%)、粘连情况(MAIT为13.8%,MFT为1.6%)。内侧瓣下鼻甲成形术(MFT)在技术上是一种简单的手术,在缓解鼻塞方面能为患者提供更长期有效的满意效果,且无明显并发症风险。由于MAIT组需要减充血的情况增多,可能需要像MFT一样进行二次手术,因此需要对MAIT进行长期随访。