Majeed Sinan Ahmed, Saeed Basil M N
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Aljumhori Teaching Hospital, Mosul, Iraq.
College of Medicine, University of Mosul, Mosul, Iraq.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Oct;74(Suppl 2):1713-1717. doi: 10.1007/s12070-021-02865-6. Epub 2021 Sep 18.
Nasal packing is the classic method adopted by many otolaryngologists to stabilize the nasal septum and decrease the occurrence of postoperative bleeding and septal hematoma after septoplasty. However, because of its associated postoperative morbidity, many surgeons started to adopt alternative methods. This study aimed to assess the outcome and benefits of septal quilting sutures in comparison to nasal packing after septoplasty. A prospective non-randomized comparative interventional study was carried out at two teaching hospitals in Mosul city from January 2020 to January 2021. A total of 60 patients who were candidates for septoplasty, were included in the study. According to the surgeon's preference; 30 patients had placement of septal quilting sutures (group A), and in the other 30 patients nasal packing was performed (group B). Patients were assessed for postoperative morbidity and early outcome in the first 24 h, 1 week and 1 month postoperatively. In the first 24 h after septoplasty, patients in group B had significantly higher levels of nasal/facial pain, headache, sleep disturbance, breathing difficulties and swallowing difficulties compared to group A ( < 0.001). Over the follow up period of 1 month, no significant differences were recorded regarding postoperative bleeding, hematoma, infection, adhesions formation and septal perforation between the two groups ( > 0.05). Septal quilting sutures technique is more favorable in the early period in terms of patient discomfort after septoplasty, better nasal block and nasal/facial pain, the absence of misery on pack removal, with minimal bleeding after surgery.
鼻腔填塞是许多耳鼻喉科医生采用的经典方法,用于稳定鼻中隔并减少鼻中隔成形术后出血和鼻中隔血肿的发生。然而,由于其相关的术后发病率,许多外科医生开始采用替代方法。本研究旨在评估鼻中隔成形术后鼻中隔缝合法与鼻腔填塞法相比的效果和益处。2020年1月至2021年1月在摩苏尔市的两家教学医院进行了一项前瞻性非随机对照干预研究。共有60名适合鼻中隔成形术的患者纳入研究。根据外科医生的偏好,30名患者采用鼻中隔缝合法(A组),另外30名患者采用鼻腔填塞法(B组)。对患者在术后24小时、1周和1个月时的术后发病率和早期结果进行评估。鼻中隔成形术后24小时内,B组患者的鼻/面部疼痛、头痛、睡眠障碍、呼吸困难和吞咽困难水平明显高于A组(<0.001)。在1个月的随访期内,两组在术后出血、血肿、感染、粘连形成和鼻中隔穿孔方面均无显著差异(>0.05)。鼻中隔缝合法在鼻中隔成形术后早期对患者不适、更好的鼻塞和鼻/面部疼痛、取出填塞物时无痛苦以及术后出血最少方面更有利。