Yan Yueyue, Zhang Qian, Yang Linlin, Zhou Wei, Ni Tianxiang, Yan Junhao
Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China; Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China; Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China; Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China; Shandong Technology Innovation Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China; National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China; Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China; Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China; Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China; Shandong Technology Innovation Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China; National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Fertil Steril. 2023 Jan;119(1):36-44. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.10.016. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
To evaluate whether prolonged storage of vitrified blastocysts negatively impacts pregnancy and neonatal outcomes.
A retrospective cohort study.
University hospital.
PATIENT(S): A total of 6,900 patients who desired to transfer vitrified blastocysts from the same oocyte retrieval cycle as their last live birth met the inclusion criteria and were grouped according to the storage duration (1,890 patients in group 1 with storage duration < 3 years, 2,693 patients in group 2 with storage duration between 3 and 4 years, 1,344 patients in group 3 with storage duration between 4 and 5 years, 578 patients in group 4 with storage duration between 5 and 6 years and 395 patients in group 5 with storage duration ≥ 6 years but ≤ 10.5 years).
INTERVENTION(S): None.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Rates of blastocyst survival, biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy, and live birth and neonatal outcomes.
RESULT(S): The survival rates of the vitrified blastocysts significantly decreased with prolonged storage from group 1 to the subsequent groups 2, 3, 4, and 5. After adjusting for potential confounding factors, the rates of biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, and live birth were significantly decreased when the vitrified blastocysts were stored for more than 6 years (group 5) compared with these for less than 3 years (group 1) but no distinct differences were found in these above-mentioned indicators among group 1, 2, 3, and group 4 (group 1 as reference). However, no significant differences were noted in the rates of miscarriage and ectopic pregnancy and neonatal outcomes on prolonged storage of vitrified blastocysts.
CONCLUSION(S): Long-term blastocyst vitrification for more than 6 years can negatively affect the rates of biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, and live birth but does not impact neonatal outcomes.
评估玻璃化冷冻囊胚的长期储存是否会对妊娠及新生儿结局产生负面影响。
一项回顾性队列研究。
大学医院。
共有6900名希望移植与其最后一次活产同一取卵周期的玻璃化冷冻囊胚的患者符合纳入标准,并根据储存时长分组(第1组1890例,储存时长<3年;第2组2693例,储存时长3至4年;第3组1344例,储存时长4至5年;第4组578例,储存时长5至6年;第5组395例,储存时长≥6年但≤10.5年)。
无。
囊胚存活率、生化妊娠率、临床妊娠率、流产率、异位妊娠率、活产率及新生儿结局。
从第1组到后续的第2、3、4和5组,玻璃化冷冻囊胚的存活率随储存时间延长显著降低。在调整潜在混杂因素后,与储存时间少于3年(第1组)相比,玻璃化冷冻囊胚储存超过6年(第5组)时,生化妊娠率、临床妊娠率和活产率显著降低,但在第1、2、3组和第4组(以第1组为参照)之间,上述指标未发现明显差异。然而,玻璃化冷冻囊胚长期储存时,流产率、异位妊娠率及新生儿结局未发现显著差异。
玻璃化冷冻囊胚长期储存超过6年可对生化妊娠率、临床妊娠率和活产率产生负面影响,但不影响新生儿结局。