Rochat Melanie, Delabays Benoît, Marques-Vidal Pedro-Manuel, Vollenweider Peter, Mach François, Vaucher Julien
Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Department of Medicine, Internal Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Am J Cardiol. 2023 Jan 15;187:138-147. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.10.013. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
Studies showing that the management of dyslipidemia is suboptimal are hampered by their cross-sectional design or short follow-up. Using recent data from a population-based cohort with a 10-year follow-up, we assessed the use of statins, including their intensity. We used data from the CoLaus|PsyColaus study, involving 4,655 participants at baseline (2003 to 2006) and 3,587 at 10-year follow-up (2014 to 2017). We assessed the cardiovascular risk of participants according to established guidelines from the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and from the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology and estimated 10-year cardiovascular risk using corresponding risk scores, Systemic Coronary Risk Evaluation risk prediction model and Pooled Cohort Equations. We first determined eligibility for statins and adherence to recommendations at 2 time periods. Additionally, we assessed the prevalence of statin users from 2014 to 2017 in persons without atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease at baseline and who developed it during the follow-up (secondary prevention). A total of 219 participants developed a first atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease during follow-up. Statin use in eligible subjects was 25.9% and 24.0% from 2003 to 2006 and 35.9% and 26.3% from 2014 to 2017, according to ESC and American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines, respectively. Per ESC guidelines, only 28.2% of treated persons achieved low-density lipoproteins cholesterol target levels from 2014 to 2017 (15.8% from 2003 to 2006), and women less frequently attained goals. Only 18% of subjects used high-intensity statins from 2014 to 2017, with women less often receiving them (14% vs 22%). In secondary prevention, only 74% of eligible subjects were using statins. In conclusion, based on contemporaneous data, management of dyslipidemia is suboptimal, including in secondary prevention, especially in women who are less frequently treated and, if treated, less frequently receive high-intensity treatment.
横断面设计或随访时间短阻碍了那些显示血脂异常管理欠佳的研究。利用一项基于人群队列且有10年随访的最新数据,我们评估了他汀类药物的使用情况,包括其使用强度。我们使用了CoLaus|PsyColaus研究的数据,该研究基线时(2003年至2006年)有4655名参与者,10年随访时(2014年至2017年)有3587名参与者。我们根据欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)以及美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会既定指南评估参与者的心血管风险,并使用相应的风险评分、系统性冠状动脉风险评估风险预测模型和汇总队列方程估计10年心血管风险。我们首先确定两个时间段使用他汀类药物的资格和对建议的依从性。此外,我们评估了2014年至2017年期间基线时无动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病且在随访期间发生该病的人群(二级预防)中他汀类药物使用者的患病率。共有219名参与者在随访期间首次发生动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病。根据ESC和美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会指南,2003年至2006年符合条件的受试者中他汀类药物使用率分别为25.9%和24.0%,2014年至2017年分别为35.9%和26.3%。根据ESC指南,2014年至2017年只有28.2%的接受治疗者达到低密度脂蛋白胆固醇目标水平(2003年至2006年为15.8%),女性达到目标的频率更低。2014年至2017年只有18%的受试者使用高强度他汀类药物,女性接受此类药物的频率更低(14%对22%)。在二级预防中,只有74%的符合条件的受试者使用他汀类药物。总之,基于同期数据,血脂异常的管理欠佳,包括在二级预防中,尤其是在女性中,她们接受治疗的频率更低,而且即使接受治疗,接受高强度治疗的频率也更低。