Greenwald Zoë R, Bouck Zachary, McLean Elizabeth, Mason Kate, Lettner Bernadette, Broad Jennifer, Dodd Zoë, Nassau Tanner, Scheim Ayden I, Werb Dan
Division of Epidemiology, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Centre on Drug Policy Evaluation, MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Viral Hepat. 2023 Feb;30(2):160-171. doi: 10.1111/jvh.13780. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
Despite the availability of publicly funded hepatitis C (HCV) treatment in Canada, treatment gaps persist, particularly among people who inject drugs. We estimate correlates of HCV care cascade engagement (testing, diagnosis, and treatment) among people who inject drugs in Toronto, Canada and examine the effect of accessing differing supervised consumption service (SCS) models on self-reported HCV testing and treatment. This is a cross-sectional baseline analysis of 701 people who inject drugs surveyed in the Toronto, Ontario integrated Supervised Injection Services (OiSIS-Toronto) study between November 2018 and March 2020. We examine correlates of self-reported HCV care cascade outcomes including SCS model, demographic, socio-structural, drug use, and harm reduction characteristics. Overall, 647 participants (92%) reported ever receiving HCV testing, of whom 336 (52%) had been diagnosed with HCV. Among participants who reported ever being diagnosed with HCV, 281 (84%) reported chronic HCV, of whom 130 (46%) reported HCV treatment uptake and 151 (54%) remained untreated. Compared to those with no SCS use, participants who had ever injected at an integrated SCS model with co-located HCV care had greater prevalence of both ever receiving HCV testing (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR]: 1.12, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.24) and ever receiving HCV treatment (aPR: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.04-2.69). Over half of participants diagnosed with chronic HCV reported remaining untreated. Our findings suggest that integrated SCS models with co-located HCV care represent key strategies for linkage to HCV care, but that more is needed to support scale-up.
尽管加拿大有公共资金支持的丙型肝炎(HCV)治疗,但治疗差距依然存在,尤其是在注射吸毒者中。我们估计了加拿大多伦多注射吸毒者中丙型肝炎治疗流程参与度(检测、诊断和治疗)的相关因素,并研究了使用不同的监督消费服务(SCS)模式对自我报告的丙型肝炎检测和治疗的影响。这是一项对2018年11月至2020年3月在安大略省多伦多综合监督注射服务(OiSIS - 多伦多)研究中接受调查的701名注射吸毒者进行的横断面基线分析。我们研究了自我报告的丙型肝炎治疗流程结果的相关因素,包括SCS模式、人口统计学、社会结构、药物使用和减少伤害特征。总体而言,647名参与者(92%)报告曾接受丙型肝炎检测,其中336人(52%)被诊断为丙型肝炎。在报告曾被诊断为丙型肝炎的参与者中,281人(84%)报告患有慢性丙型肝炎,其中130人(46%)报告接受了丙型肝炎治疗,151人(54%)仍未接受治疗。与未使用SCS的参与者相比,曾在设有丙型肝炎护理的综合SCS模式下注射的参与者接受丙型肝炎检测(调整患病率比[aPR]:1.12,95%置信区间[CI]:1.02 - 1.24)和接受丙型肝炎治疗(aPR:1.67,95% CI:1.04 - 2.69)的患病率更高。超过一半被诊断为慢性丙型肝炎的参与者报告仍未接受治疗。我们的研究结果表明,设有丙型肝炎护理的综合SCS模式是与丙型肝炎护理建立联系的关键策略,但还需要更多努力来支持扩大规模。