Elias Maria J, DeLaney Eryn N, Williams Chelsea Derlan, Hawa Sabrina, Walker Chloe J, Lozada Fantasy T, Su Jinni, Dick Danielle M
Virginia Commonwealth University.
Arizona State University.
Identity (Mahwah, N J). 2022;22(4):282-297. doi: 10.1080/15283488.2021.1999815. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
The current study examined associations between cultural socialization and ethnic-racial identity via positive and negative conversations about one's ethnicity/race. Ethnic-racial differences between Asian American, African American, Latinx, Multiracial, and White students were explored. College students 18-22 ( age = 18.46) participating in a university-wide study provided self-reports of childhood cultural socialization, engagement in conversations about ethnicity/race during college, and ethnic-racial identity. Cultural socialization was associated with more positive conversations about race, and, in turn, greater ethnic-racial identity exploration, resolution, and affirmation among all students. Additionally, among Multiracial and African American students, cultural socialization was associated with greater negative conversations about race and, in turn, less ethnic-racial identity affirmation. Although cultural socialization was not associated with negative conversations about race for Asian American, Latinx, or White students, the relation between greater negative conversations about race and less ethnic-racial identity affirmation was significant. Negative conversations about race also informed greater ethnic-racial identity exploration among all students, but was not associated with ethnic-racial identity resolution. The current study highlights the nuanced ways that childhood cultural socialization and conversations about one's ethnicity/race influence college students' ethnic-racial identity, both similarly and differently among Asian American, African American, Latinx, Multiracial, and White students. Two items created for the current study were used to assess positive and negative conversations about one's ethnicity/race in the past month. Response options for the positive conversation item ("In the past month, I had conversations with someone about something positive about my ethnic-racial group.") and negative conversation item ("In the past month, I had conversations with someone about something negative about my ethnic-racial group.") were scored using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from (1) to (5) . Higher scores indicated more frequent positive conversations and more frequent negative conversations, respectively. Initial support for the validity of the two items for positive and negative conversations about race has been provided by research with emerging adults (Delaney et al., in press).
本研究通过关于个人种族的积极和消极对话,考察了文化社会化与种族身份认同之间的关联。探讨了亚裔美国人、非裔美国人、拉丁裔、多种族和白人学生之间的种族差异。参与一项全校范围研究的18至22岁(平均年龄 = 18.46岁)大学生提供了关于童年文化社会化、大学期间参与种族相关对话以及种族身份认同的自我报告。文化社会化与更多关于种族的积极对话相关,进而在所有学生中带来更强的种族身份认同探索、解决和肯定。此外,在多种族和非裔美国学生中,文化社会化与更多关于种族的消极对话相关,进而导致更少的种族身份认同肯定。虽然文化社会化与亚裔美国人、拉丁裔或白人学生关于种族的消极对话无关,但更多关于种族的消极对话与更少的种族身份认同肯定之间的关系是显著的。关于种族的消极对话也在所有学生中促进了更强的种族身份认同探索,但与种族身份认同的解决无关。本研究突出了童年文化社会化以及关于个人种族的对话影响大学生种族身份认同的细微方式,亚裔美国人、非裔美国人、拉丁裔、多种族和白人学生之间既有相似之处也有不同之处。为当前研究创建的两个项目用于评估过去一个月中关于个人种族的积极和消极对话。积极对话项目(“在过去一个月里,我和某人谈论了关于我的种族群体的积极方面。”)和消极对话项目(“在过去一个月里,我和某人谈论了关于我的种族群体的消极方面。”)的回答选项使用从(1)到(5)的5点李克特量表进行评分。较高的分数分别表示更频繁的积极对话和更频繁的消极对话。针对新兴成年人的研究(德莱尼等人,即将发表)初步支持了这两个关于种族积极和消极对话项目的有效性。