Tim and Caroline Reynolds Center for Spinal Stimulation, Kessler Foundation, West Orange, New Jersey.
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rutgers-New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey.
J Neurophysiol. 2023 Jan 1;129(1):56-65. doi: 10.1152/jn.00268.2022. Epub 2022 Dec 7.
High-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (HF-rTMS) remains a promising strategy for neurorehabilitation. The stimulation intensity (SI) influences the aftereffects observed. Here, we examined whether single sessions of a 15 Hz rTMS protocol, administered at suprathreshold SI, can be safely administered to able-bodied (AB) individuals. Six right-handed men were included in this pilot study. HF-rTMS was delivered over the right M1, in 10 trains of 75 biphasic stimuli at 15 Hz, at 105-120% of the individual resting motor threshold (RMT). To assess safety, electromyography (EMG) was monitored to control for signs of spread of excitation and brief EMG burst (BEB) after stimulation. Additionally, TMS side effects questionnaires and the numeric rating scale (NRS) were administered during each session. We assessed corticospinal excitability (CSE) and motor performance changes with measures of resting (rMEP) and active (aMEP) motor evoked potential and grip strength and box and blocks test (BBT) scores, respectively. Overall, the sessions were tolerated and feasible without any pain development. However, EMG analysis during 15 Hz rTMS administration revealed increased BEB frequency with SI. Statistical models revealed an increase of CSE at rest (rMEP) but not during active muscle contraction (aMEP). No linear relationship was observed between 15 Hz rTMS SI and rMEP increase. No significant changes were highlighted for motor performance measures. Although feasible and tolerable by the AB individuals tested, the results demonstrate that when administered at suprathreshold intensities (≥ 105% RMT) the 15 Hz rTMS protocol reveals signs of persistent excitation, suggesting that safety precautions and close monitoring of participants should be performed when testing such combinations of high-intensity and high-frequency stimulation protocols. The results also give insight into the nonlinear existent relationship between the SI and HF-rTMS effects on CSE. The results of this pilot study show the effects of a therapeutically promising 15 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) protocol, administered at different suprathreshold intensities in able-bodied individuals. Although tolerable and feasible with a neuromodulatory potential, 15 Hz rTMS might result in persistent excitability that needs to be closely monitored if administered at suprathreshold stimulation intensity. These results reaffirm the importance of feasibility studies, especially in translational animal-to-human research.
高频重复经颅磁刺激(HF-rTMS)仍然是神经康复的一种很有前途的策略。刺激强度(SI)会影响到观察到的后效。在这里,我们研究了在阈上 SI 下给予单次 15 Hz rTMS 方案是否可以安全地用于健全个体(AB)。这项初步研究纳入了 6 名右利手男性。HF-rTMS 施加于右侧 M1,以 15 Hz 施加 10 个 75 相双相刺激的序列,刺激强度为个体静息运动阈值(RMT)的 105-120%。为了评估安全性,监测肌电图(EMG)以控制刺激后的兴奋扩散和短暂肌电爆发(BEB)迹象。此外,在每次治疗过程中还进行了 TMS 副作用问卷和数字评定量表(NRS)评估。我们使用静息运动诱发电位(rMEP)和主动运动诱发电位(aMEP)、握力和方块-木块测试(BBT)评分分别评估皮质脊髓兴奋性(CSE)和运动表现的变化。总的来说,这些治疗过程是可以耐受的,并且没有任何疼痛的发生。然而,在 15 Hz rTMS 给药期间的 EMG 分析显示,SI 增加了 BEB 的频率。统计模型显示静息时(rMEP)的 CSE 增加,但在主动肌肉收缩时(aMEP)没有增加。15 Hz rTMS SI 和 rMEP 增加之间没有观察到线性关系。运动表现测量没有显示出显著变化。尽管 AB 个体可以耐受和完成,但结果表明,当以阈上强度(≥105%RMT)给药时,15 Hz rTMS 方案显示出持续兴奋的迹象,这表明在测试高强度和高频刺激方案的组合时,应采取安全预防措施并密切监测参与者。这些结果还深入了解了 SI 和 HF-rTMS 对 CSE 的影响之间存在的非线性关系。这项初步研究的结果显示了在健全个体中给予不同阈上强度的治疗性有希望的 15 Hz 重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)方案的效果。虽然具有神经调节潜力,但是 15 Hz rTMS 可能会导致持续的兴奋性,需要在阈上刺激强度下进行密切监测。这些结果再次强调了可行性研究的重要性,尤其是在转化动物到人研究中。