Evans Tamla S, Dhir Pooja, Radley Duncan, Duarte Cristiana, Keyworth Chris, Homer Catherine, Hill Andy J, Hawkes Rhiannon, Matu Jamie, McKenna James, Ells Louisa J
Obesity Institute and School of Health, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
Obesity Institute and Carnegie School of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
Diabet Med. 2023 Apr;40(4):e15022. doi: 10.1111/dme.15022. Epub 2022 Dec 18.
NHS England commissioned four independent service providers to pilot low-calorie diet programmes to drive weight loss, improve glycaemia and potentially achieve remission of Type 2 Diabetes across 10 localities. Intervention fidelity might contribute to programme success. Previous research has illustrated a drift in fidelity in the design and delivery of other national diabetes programmes.
(1) To describe and compare the programme designs across the four service providers; (2) To assess the fidelity of programme designs to the NHS England service specification.
The NHS England service specification documents and each provider's programme design documents were double-coded for key intervention content using the Template for Intervention Description and Replication Framework and the Behaviour Change Technique (BCT) Taxonomy.
The four providers demonstrated fidelity to most but not all of the service parameters stipulated in the NHS England service specification. Providers included between 74% and 87% of the 23 BCTs identified in the NHS specification. Twelve of these BCTs were included by all four providers; two BCTs were consistently absent. An additional seven to 24 BCTs were included across providers.
A loss of fidelity for some service parameters and BCTs was identified across the provider's designs; this may have important consequences for programme delivery and thus programme outcomes. Furthermore, there was a large degree of variation between providers in the presence and dosage of additional BCTs. How these findings relate to the fidelity of programme delivery and variation in programme outcomes and experiences across providers will be examined.
英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS England)委托四家独立服务提供商试点低热量饮食计划,以推动减肥、改善血糖,并有可能在10个地区实现2型糖尿病的缓解。干预的保真度可能有助于项目的成功。先前的研究表明,在其他国家糖尿病项目的设计和实施中,保真度存在偏差。
(1)描述和比较四家服务提供商的项目设计;(2)评估项目设计对NHS England服务规范的保真度。
使用干预描述与复制框架模板和行为改变技术(BCT)分类法,对NHS England服务规范文件和每个提供商的项目设计文件进行关键干预内容的双重编码。
四家提供商对NHS England服务规范中规定的大多数但并非所有服务参数都表现出保真度。提供商纳入了NHS规范中确定的23种BCT中的74%至87%。所有四家提供商都纳入了其中12种BCT;有两种BCT始终未被纳入。各提供商还额外纳入了7至24种BCT。
在各提供商的设计中,发现某些服务参数和BCT的保真度有所缺失;这可能对项目实施以及项目成果产生重要影响。此外,各提供商在额外BCT的存在和剂量方面存在很大差异。将研究这些发现与项目实施的保真度以及各提供商在项目成果和体验方面的差异之间的关系。