Department of Cardiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan.
J Cardiol. 2023 Jun;81(6):508-512. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2022.11.012. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
To investigate the effect of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on the behavior of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels in patients with heart failure and type 2 diabetes mellitus with the use of canagliflozin compared to glimepiride.
Patients (n = 233) from the CANDLE trial were randomly assigned to either the add-on canagliflozin (n = 113) or glimepiride treatment groups (n = 120). The patients were followed-up for 24 weeks. The NT-proBNP levels were measured at baseline and after 24 weeks. The LVEF was determined at baseline.
There was a significant relationship between the baseline NT-proBNP level (X1) and the change in NT-proBNP levels from baseline to 24 weeks (Y) in the canagliflozin group (Y = -0.533 × X1 + 178; r = -0.860, p < 0.001). However, this relationship was not observed in the glimepiride group (p = 0.428). The baseline LVEF (X2) correlated with Y with a marginal significance in the canagliflozin group (Y = 7.72 × X2-549; r = 0.192, p = 0.054), but no relationship was observed in the glimepiride group. In the canagliflozin group, bivariate regression analysis showed a significant correlation between Y, X1, and X2; Y = -0.567 × X1-6.04 × X2 + 542 (R = 0.871, p < 0.001). The partial regression coefficients of X1 (p < 0.001) and X2 (p = 0.006) significantly explained the variance in Y. The correlation coefficient for X2 was negative. There was a significant relationship between the logarithmically transformed NT-proBNP [ln(NT-proBNP)] at baseline (X1') and the change in ln(NT-proBNP) values from baseline to 24 weeks (Y'), a surrogate of the rate of change in NT-proBNP levels, in the canagliflozin group (Y' = -0.18 × X1' + 0.93; r = 0.450, p = 0.001).
The baseline NT-proBNP level significantly affected the extent and the rate of its decrease by canagliflozin. The reduction in NT-proBNP levels by canagliflozin was prominent in patients with a higher LVEF at baseline. However, its confounding effect of LVEF on canagliflozin treatment was not recognized without adjusting for the NT-proBNP level at baseline.
研究与格列美脲相比,用卡格列净治疗心力衰竭和 2 型糖尿病患者时,左心室射血分数(LVEF)对 N 端脑利钠肽前体(NT-proBNP)水平变化行为的影响。
来自 CANDLE 试验的患者(n=233)被随机分配到卡格列净(n=113)或格列美脲治疗组(n=120)。患者随访 24 周。在基线和 24 周时测量 NT-proBNP 水平。在基线时确定 LVEF。
卡格列净组中,基线 NT-proBNP 水平(X1)与从基线到 24 周的 NT-proBNP 水平变化(Y)之间存在显著关系(Y=-0.533×X1+178;r=-0.860,p<0.001)。然而,在格列美脲组中未观察到这种关系(p=0.428)。在卡格列净组中,基线 LVEF(X2)与 Y 有一定的显著相关性(r=0.192,p=0.054),但在格列美脲组中没有关系。在卡格列净组中,双变量回归分析显示 Y、X1 和 X2 之间存在显著相关性;Y=-0.567×X1-6.04×X2+542(R=0.871,p<0.001)。X1(p<0.001)和 X2(p=0.006)的偏回归系数显著解释了 Y 的方差。X2 的相关系数为负。在卡格列净组中,基线时对数转换的 NT-proBNP[ln(NT-proBNP)](X1')与从基线到 24 周的 ln(NT-proBNP)值变化(Y')之间存在显著关系,Y'是 NT-proBNP 水平变化率的替代指标(Y'=-0.18×X1'+0.93;r=0.450,p=0.001)。
基线 NT-proBNP 水平显著影响卡格列净治疗的幅度和降低速率。卡格列净降低 NT-proBNP 水平在基线时 LVEF 较高的患者中更为明显。然而,如果不调整基线 NT-proBNP 水平,LVEF 对卡格列净治疗的混杂作用就无法被识别。