Institute of Brain Science, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming Chiao-Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Division of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming Chiao-Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2023 Oct;273(7):1433-1442. doi: 10.1007/s00406-022-01523-4. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
The dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (DMPFC) plays a pivotal role in depression and anxiosomatic symptom modulation. However, DMPFC stimulation using a double-cone coil has demonstrated inconsistent results for antidepressant efficacy. No study thus far has investigated the antidepressant and anti-anxiosomatic effects of prolonged intermittent theta-burst stimulation (piTBS) bilaterally over DMPFC. Furthermore, head-to-head comparisons of antidepressant effects between standard iTBS and piTBS warrant investigation. This double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial recruited 34 patients with highly treatment-resistant depression (TRD) unresponsive to antidepressants and standard repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)/piTBS. These patients were randomly assigned to one of three monotherapy groups (standard iTBS, piTBS, or sham), with treatment administered bilaterally over the DMPFC twice per day for 3 weeks. The primary outcome was the overall changes of 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17) over 3-weeks intervention. The changes in Depression and Somatic Symptoms Scale (DSSS) as the secondary outcome and the anxiosomatic cluster symptoms as rated by HDRS-17 as the post-hoc outcome were measured. Multivariable generalized estimating equation analysis was performed. Although no differences in overall HDRS-17 changes between three groups were found, the antidepressant efficacy based on DSSS was higher in piTBS than in iTBS and sham at week 3 (group effect,p = 0.003, post-hoc: piTBS > iTBS, p = 0.002; piTBS > sham, p = 0.038). In post-hoc analyses, piTBS had more alleviation in anxiosomatic symptoms than iTBS (group effect, p = 0.002; post-hoc, p = 0.001). This first randomized sham-controlled study directly compared piTBS and iTBS targeting the DMPFC using a figure-of-8 coil and found piTBS may fail to demonstrate a significant antidepressant effect on overall depressive symptoms, but piTBS seems superior in alleviating anxiosomatic symptoms, even in depressed patients with high treatment resistance. This Trial registration (Registration number: NCT04037592). URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04037592 .
背外侧前额叶皮质(DMPFC)在抑郁症和躯体症状调节中起着关键作用。然而,使用双锥线圈刺激 DMPFC 对抗抑郁疗效的效果并不一致。迄今为止,尚无研究探讨双侧 DMPFC 长时间间歇性 theta 爆发刺激(piTBS)对抑郁症和躯体症状的抗抑郁作用。此外,标准 iTBS 和 piTBS 之间抗抑郁作用的头对头比较也需要研究。这项双盲、随机、假对照试验招募了 34 名对抗抑郁药物和标准重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)/piTBS 无反应的高度治疗抵抗性抑郁症(TRD)患者。这些患者被随机分配到三个单药治疗组之一(标准 iTBS、piTBS 或假刺激),每天在 DMPFC 两侧进行两次治疗,持续 3 周。主要结局是 3 周干预期间 17 项汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HDRS-17)的总体变化。次要结局为抑郁和躯体症状量表(DSSS)的变化,HDRS-17 评定的躯体症状群症状为事后结果。采用多变量广义估计方程分析。虽然三组之间总体 HDRS-17 变化无差异,但基于 DSSS 的抗抑郁疗效在第 3 周时 piTBS 组高于 iTBS 组和假刺激组(组间效应,p=0.003,事后检验:piTBS>iTBS,p=0.002;piTBS>假刺激,p=0.038)。事后分析显示,piTBS 比 iTBS 更能缓解躯体症状群症状(组间效应,p=0.002;事后检验,p=0.001)。这项首次使用双 8 字形线圈直接比较 DMPFC 部位的 piTBS 和 iTBS 的随机假对照研究发现,piTBS 可能无法对整体抑郁症状产生显著的抗抑郁作用,但在缓解躯体症状方面,piTBS 似乎优于 iTBS,即使是在高度治疗抵抗的抑郁患者中也是如此。本试验已在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册(注册号:NCT04037592)。网址:https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04037592
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2023-10
JAMA Psychiatry. 2025-5-1
Biol Psychiatry. 2024-3-15
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2022-6-21
Front Neurosci. 2020-6-25
Am J Psychiatry. 2020-3-12