Miguel M F, Ribeiro-Filho H M N, Delagarde R
PEGASE, INRAE, Institut Agro, F-35590 Saint-Gilles, France; Centro de Ciências Agroveterinárias, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, Lages, SC, CEP: 88520-000 Brazil.
Centro de Ciências Agroveterinárias, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, Lages, SC, CEP: 88520-000 Brazil.
J Dairy Sci. 2023 Feb;106(2):1013-1025. doi: 10.3168/jds.2021-21649. Epub 2022 Dec 7.
Effects of corn silage supplementation on milk production of grazing dairy cows depend in part on the substitution rate between the 2 forages, which may be influenced by grazing management. The aim of this study was to compare 2 grazing management strategies for measuring substitution rate between herbage and corn silage, in interaction with grazing intensity. Six treatments were compared, with 2 grazing intensities and 3 supplementation strategies investigated at both grazing intensities. The 2 grazing intensities were severe and light grazing, defined by either (1) herbage allowance (HA) of 15 (severe) or 30 (light) kg dry matter (DM)/cow per d at 3 cm above ground level or (2) postgrazing sward height, depending on the supplementation strategy. The 3 supplementation strategies were as follows: (U) an unsupplemented treatment, (A) 5 kg DM/d of corn silage offered at a similar HA as in U, and (H) 5 kg DM/d of corn silage offered at a similar postgrazing sward height as in U. Thirty-six multiparous Holstein cows were used in a randomized complete block design and divided in 2 groups for the entire experiment, one for each grazing intensity. Within each grazing intensity group, the corn silage supplementation strategy was studied using a 3 × 3 Greco-Latin square design, with 3 periods of 14 d. Supplementing cows with corn silage increased total DM intake only for severe grazing by 1.7 kg DM/d. The substitution rate between corn silage and grazed herbage was lower for severe than for light grazing, averaging 0.63 and 1.23, respectively. Herbage dry matter intake was lower by 1.2 kg/d for strategy H than A, leading to lower substitution rates (0.81 vs. 0.99, respectively), irrespective of grazing intensity. Milk production increased with silage supplementation for severe grazing (+1.0 kg/d milk) and was unaffected by silage supplementation for light grazing (-0.4 kg/d milk). The milk production response to corn silage supplementation averaged +0.23 and -0.08 kg of milk per kg DM of silage for severe and light grazing, respectively. Fat-corrected milk production tended to be lower by 0.4 kg/d for strategy H than A, leading to lower milk production response (+0.00 vs. +0.12 kg of milk per kg DM of silage, respectively). Milk protein concentration increased with silage supplementation for severe grazing (+1.0 g/kg) but decreased with silage supplementation for light grazing (-0.6 g/kg). Milk fat concentration did not differ among treatments. On average, daily grazing time (-47 min/d, i.e., -9%) and herbage intake rate (-4.9 g of DM/min, i.e., -14%) decreased when cows were supplemented, with greater grazing time reduction at severe than light grazing, and greater herbage intake rate reduction at light than severe grazing. In conclusion, the greater substitution rate and the lower 4% fat-corrected milk production when corn silage was provided at a similar postgrazing sward height rather than at a similar HA to those of unsupplemented cows explain why supplementing grazing dairy cows with conserved forages has no strong effect in practice from a production point of view.
补饲玉米青贮对放牧奶牛产奶量的影响部分取决于两种饲草之间的替代率,而替代率可能受放牧管理的影响。本研究的目的是比较两种放牧管理策略,以测定牧草与玉米青贮之间的替代率,并研究其与放牧强度的相互作用。比较了六种处理,在两种放牧强度下分别研究了2种放牧强度和3种补饲策略。两种放牧强度分别为重度放牧和轻度放牧,其定义为:(1) 距地面3厘米处每头奶牛每日的牧草供应量(HA)为15千克(重度)或30千克(轻度)干物质(DM),或 (2) 根据补饲策略确定的放牧后草地高度。三种补饲策略如下:(U) 不补饲处理,(A) 以与U组相似的HA水平补饲5千克DM/d的玉米青贮,(H) 以与U组相似的放牧后草地高度补饲5千克DM/d的玉米青贮。36头经产荷斯坦奶牛采用随机完全区组设计,在整个试验过程中分为两组,每种放牧强度一组。在每个放牧强度组内,采用3×3希腊-拉丁方设计研究玉米青贮补饲策略,试验期为3个14天。给奶牛补饲玉米青贮仅使重度放牧组的总干物质摄入量增加了1.7千克DM/d。重度放牧时玉米青贮与放牧牧草之间的替代率低于轻度放牧,平均分别为0.63和1.23。无论放牧强度如何,策略H组的牧草干物质摄入量比A组低1.2千克/d,导致替代率更低(分别为0.81和0.99)。重度放牧时补饲青贮使产奶量增加(+1.0千克/d牛奶),轻度放牧时补饲青贮对产奶量无影响(-0.4千克/d牛奶)。重度放牧和轻度放牧时,补饲玉米青贮的产奶量反应平均分别为每千克DM青贮增加0.23千克和-0.08千克牛奶。策略H组的乳脂校正乳产量比A组低0.4千克/d,导致产奶量反应更低(分别为每千克DM青贮增加0.00千克和0.12千克牛奶)。重度放牧时补饲青贮使乳蛋白浓度增加(+1.0克/千克),轻度放牧时补饲青贮使乳蛋白浓度降低(-0.6克/千克)。各处理间乳脂浓度无差异。平均而言,补饲奶牛时,每日放牧时间减少(-47分钟/d,即-9%),牧草采食量降低(-4.9克DM/分钟,即-14%),重度放牧时放牧时间减少幅度大于轻度放牧,轻度放牧时牧草采食量降低幅度大于重度放牧。总之,当以与未补饲奶牛相似的放牧后草地高度而非相似的HA水平提供玉米青贮时,替代率更高,4%乳脂校正乳产量更低,这就解释了为什么从生产角度来看,给放牧奶牛补饲青贮饲料在实际中并没有显著效果。