Department of Psychology & Child Development, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA, USA.
Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Cortex. 2023 Jan;158:96-109. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2022.10.011. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
A fundamental aspect of object detection is assigning a border to one (figure) side but not the other (ground) side. Figures are shaped; grounds appear shapeless near the figure border. Accumulating evidence supports the view that the mechanism of figure assignment is inhibitory competition with the figure perceived on the winning side. Suppression has been observed on the groundside of figure borders. One prediction is that more suppression will be observed when the groundside competes more for figural status. We tested this prediction by assessing BOLD activation on the groundside of two types of stimuli with articulated borders: AE and AE stimuli. In both stimulus types, multiple image-based priors (symmetry, closure, small area, enclosure by a larger region) favored the inside as the figure. In AE but not AE stimuli, the figural prior of familiar configuration present on the outside competes for figural status. Observers perceived the insides of both types of stimuli as novel figures and the outsides as shapeless grounds. Previously, we observed lower BOLD activation in early visual areas representing the grounds of AE than AE stimuli, although unexpectedly, activation was above baseline. With articulated borders, it can be difficult to exclude figure activation from ground ROIs. Here, our ground ROIs better excluded figure activation; we also added straight-edge (SE) control stimuli and increased the sample size. In early visual areas representing the grounds, we observed lower BOLD activation on the groundside of AE than AE stimuli and below-baseline BOLD activation on the groundside of SE and AE stimuli. These results, indicating that greater suppression is applied to groundsides that competed more for figural status but lost the competition, support a Bayesian model of figure assignment in which proto-objects activated at both low and high levels where image features and familiar configurations are represented, respectively, compete for figural status.
目标检测的一个基本方面是为一侧(图形)分配边界,但不为另一侧(背景)分配边界。图形是有形状的;在图形边界附近,背景看起来没有形状。越来越多的证据支持这样一种观点,即分配图形的机制是与在获胜侧感知到的图形进行抑制性竞争。在图形边界的背景侧观察到了抑制。一个预测是,当背景侧更争夺图形地位时,将观察到更多的抑制。我们通过评估具有铰接边界的两种类型的刺激物(AE 和 AE 刺激物)的背景侧的 BOLD 激活来测试这个预测。在这两种刺激类型中,多个基于图像的先验(对称、闭合、小面积、被更大区域包围)都有利于内部作为图形。在 AE 刺激物中,但不是在 AE 刺激物中,外部存在的熟悉配置的图形先验竞争图形地位。观察者将两种类型的刺激物的内部视为新颖的图形,将外部视为无形状的背景。之前,我们观察到代表 AE 刺激物背景的早期视觉区域的 BOLD 激活低于 AE 刺激物,尽管出人意料的是,激活高于基线。对于具有铰接边界的刺激物,从背景 ROI 中排除图形激活可能很困难。在这里,我们的背景 ROI 更好地排除了图形激活;我们还添加了直边(SE)对照刺激物并增加了样本量。在代表背景的早期视觉区域中,我们观察到 AE 刺激物的背景侧的 BOLD 激活低于 AE 刺激物,并且 SE 和 AE 刺激物的背景侧的 BOLD 激活低于基线。这些结果表明,对竞争图形地位但失败的背景侧施加了更大的抑制,支持了一种图形分配的贝叶斯模型,其中在图像特征和熟悉配置分别代表的低水平和高水平上激活的原对象竞争图形地位。