El-Batahgy Abdel-Monem, Elkousy Mohamed Raafat, Al-Rahman Ahmed Abd, Gumenyuk Andrey, Rethmeier Michael, Gook Sergej
Central Metallurgical Research and Development Institute (CMRDI), Cairo 11421, Egypt.
Metallurgical Engineering Department, Cairo University, Giza 12613, Egypt.
Materials (Basel). 2022 Nov 30;15(23):8538. doi: 10.3390/ma15238538.
Motivated by the loss of tensile strength in 9%Ni steel arc-welded joints performed using commercially available Ni-based austenitic filler metals, the viability of retaining tensile strength using an experimentally produced matching ferritic filler metal was confirmed. Compared to the austenitic Ni-based filler metal (685 MPa), higher tensile strength in gas metal arc (GMA) welded joints was achieved using a ferritic filler metal (749 MPa) due to its microstructure being similar to the base metal (645 MPa). The microstructure of hard martensite resulted in an impact energy of 71 J (-196 °C), which was two times higher than the specified minimum value of ≥34 J. The tensile and impact strength of the welded joint is affected not only by its microstructure, but also by the degree of its mechanical mismatch depending on the type of filler metal. Welds with a harder microstructure and less mechanical mismatch are important for achieving an adequate combination of tensile strength and notched impact strength. This is achievable with the cost-effective ferritic filler metal. A more desirable combination of mechanical properties is guaranteed by applying low preheating temperature (200 °C), which is a more practicable and economical solution compared to the high post-weld heat treatment (PWHT) temperature (580 °C) suggested by other research.
鉴于使用市售镍基奥氏体填充金属进行9%镍钢电弧焊接头时拉伸强度的损失,通过实验生产的匹配铁素体填充金属来保持拉伸强度的可行性得到了证实。与奥氏体镍基填充金属(685兆帕)相比,使用铁素体填充金属(749兆帕)在气体保护金属电弧(GMA)焊接接头中实现了更高的拉伸强度,这是因为其微观结构与母材(645兆帕)相似。硬马氏体的微观结构导致冲击能量为71焦(-196℃),这比规定的最小值≥34焦高出两倍。焊接接头的拉伸强度和冲击强度不仅受其微观结构影响,还受取决于填充金属类型的机械不匹配程度影响。具有更硬微观结构和更小机械不匹配的焊缝对于实现拉伸强度和缺口冲击强度的适当组合很重要。使用具有成本效益的铁素体填充金属即可实现这一点。通过采用低预热温度(200℃)保证了更理想的机械性能组合,与其他研究建议的高焊后热处理(PWHT)温度(580℃)相比,这是一种更可行且经济的解决方案。