Department of Biomedical Engineering, Radiation Sciences, Umeå University, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden.
Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Umeå University, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden.
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Dec 6;22(23):9557. doi: 10.3390/s22239557.
The modified Mallet scale (MMS) is commonly used to grade shoulder function in brachial plexus birth injury (BPBI) but has limited sensitivity and cannot grade scapulothoracic and glenohumeral mobility. This study aims to evaluate if the addition of a wearable inertial movement unit (IMU) system could improve clinical assessment based on MMS. The system validity was analyzed with simultaneous measurements with the IMU system and an optical camera system in three asymptomatic individuals. Test-retest and interrater reliability were analyzed in nine asymptomatic individuals and six BPBI patients. IMUs were placed on the upper arm, forearm, scapula, and thorax. Peak angles, range of motion, and average joint angular speed in the shoulder, scapulothoracic, glenohumeral, and elbow joints were analyzed during mobility assessments and MMS tasks. In the validity tests, clusters of reflective markers were placed on the sensors. The validity was high with an error standard deviation below 3.6°. Intraclass correlation coefficients showed that 90.3% of the 69 outcome scores showed good-to-excellent test-retest reliability, and 41% of the scores gave significant differences between BPBI patients and controls with good-to-excellent test-retest reliability. The interrater reliability was moderate to excellent, implying that standardization is important if the patient is followed-up longitudinally.
改良的 Mallet 量表(MMS)常用于评估臂丛神经损伤性分娩(BPBI)后的肩部功能,但该量表的敏感性有限,无法评估肩胛胸壁和盂肱关节的活动度。本研究旨在评估可穿戴惯性运动单元(IMU)系统是否可以改善基于 MMS 的临床评估。通过在三名无症状个体中同时使用 IMU 系统和光学摄像系统进行系统有效性分析。在九名无症状个体和六名 BPBI 患者中进行测试-再测试和组内者间可靠性分析。IMU 分别放置在上臂、前臂、肩胛骨和胸部。在移动性评估和 MMS 任务期间,分析肩部、肩胛胸壁、盂肱和肘部关节的峰值角度、运动范围和平均关节角速度。在有效性测试中,在传感器上放置了一簇反射标记物。标准偏差低于 3.6°,表明具有较高的有效性。组内相关系数显示,69 个结果评分中有 90.3%具有良好到极好的测试-再测试可靠性,并且 41%的评分在具有良好到极好的测试-再测试可靠性的 BPBI 患者和对照组之间具有显著差异。组内者间可靠性为中等到极好,这意味着如果患者需要进行纵向随访,则标准化非常重要。