• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新生儿颈动脉夹层相关性动脉缺血性脑卒中:病例报告和系统文献回顾。

Neonatal Arterial Ischemic Stroke Secondary to Carotid Artery Dissection: A Case Report and Systematic Literature Review.

机构信息

Paediatric Neurology and Neurophysiology Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy; Master in Pediatrics and Pediatric Subspecialties, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

Paediatric Neurology and Neurophysiology Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy; Neuroimmunology group, Paediatric Research Institute "Città della Speranza", Padova, Italy.

出版信息

Pediatr Neurol. 2023 Feb;139:13-21. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2022.10.008. Epub 2022 Oct 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2022.10.008
PMID:36502767
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Carotid artery (CA) dissection is a rare etiology of neonatal arterial ischemic stroke (NAIS).

METHODS

We describe one novel case and conduct a systematic literature review on NAIS attributed to CA dissection, to collect data on its clinical-radiological presentation, treatment, and outcome.

RESULTS

Eight published cases of NAIS attributed to CA dissection were identified and analyzed with our case. All patients (nine of nine) were born at term, and eight of nine experienced instrumental/traumatic delivery or urgent Caesarean section. None had fetal problems during pregnancy or thrombophilia. Signs and symptoms at presentation (between days of life 0 and 6) included seizures (eight of nine), respiratory distress or irregular breathing (five of nine), hyporeactivity, decreased consciousness or irritability (four of nine), and focal neurological signs (two of nine). At magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), stroke was unilateral in seven of nine and extensive in five of nine. CA dissection was documented by neuroimaging or at postmortem studies (seven of nine), and hypothesized by the treating physicians based on delivery and neuroradiology characteristics (in the remaining two of nine). Antithrombotic treatment was used in two of nine. According to available follow-up, one of eight died at age seven days, seven of eight had neurological/epileptic sequelae, and CA recanalization occurred in three of four.

CONCLUSIONS

NAIS attributed to CA dissection is rarely identified in the literature, often preceded by traumatic/instrumental delivery, presenting with seizures and systemic signs/symptoms, and often characterized by extensive MRI lesions and neurological sequelae. Definite evidence and recommendations on antithrombotic treatment are lacking.

摘要

背景

颈动脉(CA)夹层是新生儿动脉缺血性脑卒中(NAIS)的罕见病因。

方法

我们描述了一个新病例,并对归因于 CA 夹层的 NAIS 进行了系统的文献回顾,以收集其临床-影像学表现、治疗和结果的数据。

结果

确定并分析了 8 例归因于 CA 夹层的 NAIS 病例,包括我们的病例。所有患者(9 例中有 9 例)均足月出生,9 例中有 8 例经历了器械/创伤性分娩或紧急剖宫产。无一例在怀孕期间或存在血栓形成倾向时有胎儿问题。发病时的体征和症状(在出生后 0 至 6 天)包括癫痫发作(9 例中有 8 例)、呼吸窘迫或不规则呼吸(9 例中有 5 例)、反应迟钝、意识减退或烦躁(9 例中有 4 例)和局灶性神经体征(9 例中有 2 例)。在磁共振成像(MRI)中,7 例中风为单侧,5 例广泛。7 例通过神经影像学或尸检研究证实了 CA 夹层,2 例根据分娩和神经放射学特征由治疗医生假设(9 例中有 2 例)。9 例中有 2 例使用了抗血栓治疗。根据现有的随访结果,1 例在 7 天大时死亡,8 例中有 7 例有神经/癫痫后遗症,4 例中有 3 例 CA 再通。

结论

文献中很少发现归因于 CA 夹层的 NAIS,通常在创伤性/器械性分娩之前发生,表现为癫痫发作和全身体征/症状,并且通常具有广泛的 MRI 病变和神经后遗症。缺乏关于抗血栓治疗的明确证据和建议。

相似文献

1
Neonatal Arterial Ischemic Stroke Secondary to Carotid Artery Dissection: A Case Report and Systematic Literature Review.新生儿颈动脉夹层相关性动脉缺血性脑卒中:病例报告和系统文献回顾。
Pediatr Neurol. 2023 Feb;139:13-21. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2022.10.008. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
2
Perinatal arterial ischemic stroke related to carotid artery occlusion.与颈动脉闭塞相关的围产期动脉缺血性卒中
Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2016 Jul;20(4):639-48. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2016.03.003. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
3
An exploratory study to identify neonatal arterial ischemic stroke: A single-center study.探索性研究以确定新生儿动脉缺血性卒中:一项单中心研究。
Brain Dev. 2022 Nov;44(10):672-680. doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2022.08.005. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
4
Massive Neonatal Arterial Ischemic Stroke.巨大儿脑动脉缺血性脑卒中。
Pediatr Neurol. 2023 Jul;144:5-10. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2023.03.013. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
5
Craniocervical arterial dissection: a cause of childhood arterial ischemic stroke in Taiwan.颅颈动脉夹层:台湾儿童急性动脉缺血性脑卒中的病因。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2010 Feb;109(2):156-62. doi: 10.1016/S0929-6646(10)60036-8.
6
Contralateral Massive Neonatal Arterial Ischemic Stroke Secondary to Carotid Artery Dissection: A Case Report.颈动脉夹层继发对侧巨大新生儿动脉缺血性卒中:一例报告
Cureus. 2023 Nov 7;15(11):e48452. doi: 10.7759/cureus.48452. eCollection 2023 Nov.
7
[Neonatal arterial ischemic stroke: Review of the current guidelines].[新生儿动脉缺血性卒中:现行指南综述]
Arch Pediatr. 2017 Feb;24(2):180-188. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2016.11.005. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
8
Cervical Artery Dissection in Postpartum Women after Cesarean and Vaginal Delivery.剖宫产和阴道分娩后产后妇女的颈动脉夹层。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2022 Aug;31(8):106572. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2022.106572. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
9
Should Patients With Acute Minor Ischemic Stroke With Isolated Internal Carotid Artery Occlusion Be Thrombolysed?急性轻度缺血性脑卒中伴孤立性颈内动脉闭塞患者是否应该溶栓?
Stroke. 2022 Nov;53(11):3304-3312. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.039228. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
10
Long-term developmental condition following neonatal arterial ischemic stroke: A systematic review.新生儿动脉缺血性卒中后的长期发育状况:系统评价。
Arch Pediatr. 2023 Nov;30(8):600-606. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2023.07.007. Epub 2023 Oct 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Contralateral Massive Neonatal Arterial Ischemic Stroke Secondary to Carotid Artery Dissection: A Case Report.颈动脉夹层继发对侧巨大新生儿动脉缺血性卒中:一例报告
Cureus. 2023 Nov 7;15(11):e48452. doi: 10.7759/cureus.48452. eCollection 2023 Nov.
2
Relationship Between Neonatal Brain Injury and Objective Measures of Head Trauma: A Case-Control Study.新生儿脑损伤与头部外伤客观指标的关系:病例对照研究。
Neurology. 2023 Dec 4;101(23):e2401-e2410. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207766.