Osawa Eduardo A, Cutuli Salvatore L, Yanase Fumitaka, Iguchi Naoya, Bitker Laurent, Maciel Alexandre T, Lankadeva Yugeesh R, May Clive N, Evans Roger G, Eastwood Glenn M, Bellomo Rinaldo
Imed Group Research Department, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Sao Camilo, Unidade Pompeia, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Intensive Care Med Exp. 2022 Dec 12;10(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s40635-022-00479-y.
Continuous measurement of urinary PO (PuO) is being applied to indirectly monitor renal medullary PO. However, when applied to critically ill patients with shock, its measurement may be affected by changes in FiO and PaO and potential associated O diffusion between urine and ureteric or bladder tissue. We aimed to investigate PuO measurements in septic shock patients with a fiberoptic luminescence optode inserted into the urinary catheter lumen in relation to episodes of FiO change. We also evaluated medullary and urinary oxygen tension values in Merino ewes at two different FiO levels.
In 10 human patients, there were 32 FiO decreases and 31 increases in FiO. Median pre-decrease FiO was 0.36 [0.30, 0.39] and median post-decrease FiO was 0.30 [0.23, 0.30], p = 0.006. PaO levels decreased from 83 mmHg [77, 94] to 72 [62, 80] mmHg, p = 0.009. However, PuO was 23.2 mmHg [20.5, 29.0] before and 24.2 mmHg [20.6, 26.3] after the intervention (p = 0.56). The median pre-increase FiO was 0.30 [0.21, 0.30] and median post-increase FiO was 0.35 [0.30, 0.40], p = 0.008. PaO levels increased from 64 mmHg [58, 72 mmHg] to 71 mmHg [70, 100], p = 0.04. However, PuO was 25.0 mmHg [IQR: 20.7, 26.8] before and 24.3 mmHg [IQR: 20.7, 26.3] after the intervention (p = 0.65). A mixed linear regression model showed a weak correlation between the variation in PaO and the variation in PuO values. In 9 Merino ewes, when comparing oxygen tension levels between FiO of 0.21 and 0.40, medullary values did not differ (25.1 ± 13.4 mmHg vs. 27.9 ± 15.4 mmHg, respectively, p = 0.6766) and this was similar to urinary oxygen values (27.1 ± 6.17 mmHg vs. 29.7 ± 4.41 mmHg, respectively, p = 0.3192).
Changes in FiO and PaO within the context of usual care did not affect PuO. Our findings were supported by experimental data and suggest that PuO can be used as biomarker of medullary oxygenation irrespective of FiO.
持续测量尿PO(PuO)正被用于间接监测肾髓质PO。然而,当应用于休克危重症患者时,其测量可能会受到FiO和PaO变化以及尿液与输尿管或膀胱组织之间潜在的氧扩散的影响。我们旨在研究将光纤发光光极插入尿管腔的脓毒症休克患者的PuO测量值与FiO变化情况的关系。我们还评估了处于两种不同FiO水平的美利奴母羊的髓质和尿液氧分压值。
在10例人类患者中,FiO降低32次,FiO升高31次。降低前FiO的中位数为0.36[0.30,0.39],降低后FiO的中位数为0.30[0.23,0.30],p = 0.006。PaO水平从83 mmHg[77,94]降至72[62,80]mmHg,p = 0.009。然而,干预前PuO为23.2 mmHg[20.5,29.0],干预后为24.2 mmHg[20.6,26.3](p = 0.56)。升高前FiO的中位数为0.30[0.21,0.30],升高后FiO的中位数为0.35[0.30,0.40],p = 0.008。PaO水平从64 mmHg[58,72 mmHg]升至71 mmHg[70,100],p = 0.04。然而,干预前PuO为25.0 mmHg[四分位间距:20.7,26.8],干预后为24.3 mmHg[四分位间距:20.7,26.3](p = 0.65)。混合线性回归模型显示PaO变化与PuO值变化之间存在弱相关性。在9只美利奴母羊中,比较FiO为0.21和0.40时的氧分压水平,髓质值无差异(分别为25.1±13.4 mmHg和27.9±15.4 mmHg,p = 0.6766),这与尿液氧值情况相似(分别为27.1±6.17 mmHg和29.7±4.41 mmHg,p = 0.3192)。
常规护理中FiO和PaO的变化不影响PuO。我们的研究结果得到了实验数据的支持,并表明无论FiO如何,PuO都可作为髓质氧合的生物标志物。