Zabolinezhad Hedieh, Eslami Saeid, Hassibian Mohammad Reza, Dorri Sara
Department of Medical Informatics, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Health Information Technology Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Front Digit Health. 2022 Nov 23;4:856010. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.856010. eCollection 2022.
The present study aimed to assess the quality of electronic medical records (EMR) retrieved from hospital information systems (HIS) of three educational hospitals in Mashhad, Iran.
In this multi-center, cross-sectional study, inpatient electronic records collected from three academic hospitals were categorized into five data groups, namely demographics (D); care handler (CH), indicating the doers of the medical actions; diagnosis and treatment (DT); administrative and financial (AF); and laboratory and Para clinic (LP). Next, we asked 25 physicians from the three academic hospitals to determine data elements of medical research and education value (called research and educational data) in every group. Flowingly, the quality of the five data groups (completeness * accuracy) was reported for entire sampled data and those specified as research and educational data, based on the exact concordance between electronic medical records and corresponding paper records. HISRA, standing for HIS recording ability, was also assessed compared to data elements of standard paper forms.
For entire data, HISRA was 58.5%. In all hospitals, the highest data quality (more than 90%) belongs to D and AF data groups, and the lowest quality goes to CH and DT groups (less than 50%, and 60%, respectively). For research and educational data, HISRA was 47%, and the quality of D and AF data groups were the highest (nearly 100%), while CH and DT stood around 50% and 60% in order. The quality of the LP data group was almost 85% in all hospitals but hospital C (well over 30%). Total data quality for the hospitals was almost less than 70%.
The low quality of electronic medical records was mostly a result of incompleteness, while the accuracy was relatively good. Results showed that the HIS application development mainly focused on administrative and financial aspects rather than academic and clinical goals.
本研究旨在评估从伊朗马什哈德的三家教学医院的医院信息系统(HIS)中检索到的电子病历(EMR)的质量。
在这项多中心横断面研究中,从三家学术医院收集的住院电子记录被分为五个数据组,即人口统计学(D);护理人员(CH),指医疗行为的执行者;诊断与治疗(DT);行政与财务(AF);以及实验室与辅助科室(LP)。接下来,我们让来自这三家学术医院的25名医生确定每个组中具有医学研究和教育价值的数据元素(称为研究和教育数据)。随后,根据电子病历与相应纸质记录之间的精确一致性,报告了整个抽样数据以及指定为研究和教育数据的五个数据组的质量(完整性*准确性)。还将代表HIS记录能力的HISRA与标准纸质表格的数据元素进行了比较评估。
对于全部数据,HISRA为58.5%。在所有医院中,数据质量最高(超过90%)的是D组和AF组,质量最低的是CH组和DT组(分别低于50%和60%)。对于研究和教育数据,HISRA为47%,D组和AF组的数据质量最高(接近100%),而CH组和DT组依次约为50%和60%。除医院C外(远超30%),所有医院LP数据组的质量几乎为85%。各医院的总体数据质量几乎低于70%。
电子病历质量低主要是不完整导致的,而准确性相对较好。结果表明,HIS的应用开发主要侧重于行政和财务方面,而非学术和临床目标。