Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada..
University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
J Clin Densitom. 2023 Jan-Mar;26(1):83-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2022.12.004. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
Lumbar spine Trabecular Bone Score (TBS), a grey-level texture measure derived from spine dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) images, is a bone mineral density (BMD)-independent risk factor for fracture. An unresolved and controversial question is whether there are ethnic differences that affect the utility of TBS for fracture risk assessment. The current analysis examined whether self-identified ethnicity (White, Asian, Black) in women age 40 years and older referred for DXA testing affected fracture risk stratification from TBS using a large clinical registry. The study population comprised 63,078 White women, 1,915 Asian women and 329 Black women (n=329) with mean follow up 9.0±5.2 years. There were between group differences in BMI (Black>White>Asian), lumbar spine fat percentage (Asian>White>Black) and lumbar spine tissue thickness (Black>White>Asian). Despite this, lumbar spine TBS was not significantly different between the subgroups, though there was a significant difference in lumbar spine and total hip BMD (Black >White>Asian). TBS provided significant stratification for MOF and any fracture for all ethnicity subgroups, and for hip fracture in White and Asian subgroups (insufficient numbers for analysis in Black women). No significant difference in White vs. Asian or White vs. Black women were identified using a Bonferroni adjusted p-value. In summary, we found that lumbar spine TBS measurements were similar among White, Asian and Black women referred for DXA assessment in Manitoba, Canada. TBS and BMD measurements significantly stratified fracture risk in all three populations without a meaningful difference between groups. This suggests that TBS does not need to be used differently in White vs. non-White populations.
腰椎骨小梁骨密度评分(TBS)是一种从脊柱双能 X 射线吸收法(DXA)图像中提取的灰度纹理测量方法,是骨折的独立于骨密度(BMD)的危险因素。一个悬而未决且有争议的问题是,是否存在影响 TBS 用于骨折风险评估的种族差异。目前的分析检查了年龄在 40 岁及以上接受 DXA 检测的女性,自我认定的种族(白种人、亚洲人、黑种人)是否会影响 TBS 对骨折风险的分层,这是基于一个大型临床注册研究。研究人群包括 63078 名白人女性、1915 名亚洲女性和 329 名黑人女性(n=329),平均随访时间为 9.0±5.2 年。组间存在 BMI(黑人>白人>亚洲人)、腰椎脂肪百分比(亚洲人>白人>黑人)和腰椎组织厚度(黑人>白人>亚洲人)的差异。尽管如此,腰椎 TBS 在亚组之间没有显著差异,尽管腰椎和全髋 BMD 存在显著差异(黑人>白人>亚洲人)。TBS 为 MOF 和所有种族亚组的任何骨折提供了显著的分层,为白人组和亚洲组的髋部骨折提供了显著的分层(黑人女性的分析数量不足)。在白人女性与亚洲女性或白人女性与黑人女性之间,使用 Bonferroni 调整后的 p 值没有发现显著差异。总之,我们发现,在加拿大马尼托巴省接受 DXA 评估的白种人、亚洲人和黑种人女性中,腰椎 TBS 测量值相似。TBS 和 BMD 测量值在所有三个人群中显著分层骨折风险,各组之间无显著差异。这表明 TBS 不需要在白种人与非白种人之间使用不同的方法。