Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shoulder and Elbow Unit, OLVG Hospital, Jan Tooropstraat 164, 1061 AE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1105, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Jul;31(7):2581-2592. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-07267-x. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
Bone augmentation techniques show a relatively high complication rate, which might be due to graft non-union and resorption. It is unclear which augmentation techniques demonstrate the highest amount of non-union and resorption and whether this leads to worse clinical or functional outcomes. Therefore, the aim of this review was (i) to compare non-union and resorption rates between surgical approaches, procedures, graft types, donor sites and fixation methods regarding clinical and functional outcomes and (ii) determine whether high non-union or resorption rates lead to less favorable clinical or functional outcomes.
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statements were followed. PubMed, EMBASE (Ovid) and Cochrane Library were searched on December 15th 2021 for studies examining bone graft non-union or resorption using radiograph or CT following glenoid augmentation to treat anterior shoulder dislocation.
The search resulted in 103 inclusions, comprising 5,128 glenoid augmentations. When comparing pooled proportions of bony union, graft fracture rate, hardware failure rate, recurrence rate, return to sports and Rowe score, most results were similar between approaches, procedures, graft types, donor sites and fixation methods. High resorption rates were seen for allograft augmentation (74.3; 95% CI: 39.8-92.7) compared to autograft augmentation (15.5; 95% CI 10.1-23.2), but this was not associated with higher recurrence rates or worse clinical outcomes. Meta-analyses (8 studies; 494 patients) demonstrated no difference in incomplete and complete non-union rates between arthroscopic and open procedures; however, both analyses showed substantial heterogeneity. Higher partial resorption rates were observed on CT (48.0; 95% CI 43.3-52.7) compared to radiograph (14.1; 95% CI 10.9-18.1). Three studies comprising 267 shoulders demonstrated a higher rate of non-union and recurrence in smokers, whereas one study comprising 38 shoulders did not.
Non-union and resorption rates were similar among procedures, grafts and fixation methods. Higher resorption rates were observed in allografts, but this was not associated with higher recurrence rates or worse clinical outcomes. Pooling data demonstrated substantial heterogeneity and definitions varied among studies, warranting more standardized measuring.
IV.
骨增强技术的并发症发生率相对较高,这可能是由于移植物不愈合和吸收所致。目前尚不清楚哪种增强技术的不愈合和吸收发生率最高,以及这是否会导致更差的临床或功能结果。因此,本综述的目的是:(i)比较不同手术方法、手术程序、移植物类型、供体部位和固定方法在临床和功能结果方面的不愈合和吸收发生率;(ii)确定高不愈合或高吸收率是否会导致更差的临床或功能结果。
本研究遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目。于 2021 年 12 月 15 日,通过 PubMed、EMBASE(Ovid)和 Cochrane 图书馆,对使用影像学或 CT 检查评估肩盂增强治疗复发性肩关节前脱位的骨不愈合或骨吸收的研究进行检索。
搜索共纳入 103 项研究,共包括 5128 例肩盂增强。当比较骨愈合、移植物骨折、内固定失败、复发、重返运动和 Rowe 评分的汇总比例时,大多数结果在不同的方法、手术程序、移植物类型、供体部位和固定方法之间相似。同种异体移植物增强(74.3%;95%CI:39.8%-92.7%)与自体移植物增强(15.5%;95%CI:10.1%-23.2%)相比,出现高吸收率,但这与更高的复发率或更差的临床结果无关。荟萃分析(8 项研究;494 例患者)显示,关节镜与开放手术之间不完全和完全不愈合率无差异;然而,两种分析均显示存在较大的异质性。在 CT 上观察到的部分吸收率较高(48.0%;95%CI:43.3%-52.7%),而在 X 线上观察到的吸收率较低(14.1%;95%CI:10.9%-18.1%)。3 项研究(共 267 例)表明,吸烟与更高的不愈合和复发率相关,而 1 项研究(共 38 例)则没有。
在手术程序、移植物和固定方法中,不愈合和吸收率相似。同种异体移植物的吸收率较高,但与更高的复发率或更差的临床结果无关。数据汇总显示存在较大的异质性,且研究之间的定义存在差异,需要更加标准化的测量。
IV 级。