Suppr超能文献

通过自杀性双系统模型实时理解自杀途径:生态瞬时评估的潜力。

Understanding suicidal pathways through the lens of a Dual-System Model of Suicidality in real-time: The potential of ecological momentary assessments.

作者信息

Brüdern Juliane, Glaesmer Heide, Berger Thomas, Spangenberg Lena

机构信息

Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2022 Nov 28;13:899500. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.899500. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Within the ideation-to-action framework, existing theories of suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs) primarily focus on the linear progression of suicide risk. This, however, neglects growing evidence that many suicidal individuals do not experience their suicide attempt as a planned action, and in some instances deny even having experienced any suicidal thoughts. Furthermore, recent research has found that risk factors differ substantially between persons and that this is reflected in the variety of suicidal pathways. Considering the strong variability of STBs, new innovative theoretical concepts and assessment methods are needed to advance our understanding of multiple suicidal pathways. In this review, we apply a dual-system framework to suicidality, the Dual-System Model of Suicidality (DSMS), which accounts for two different systems of information processing and behavior. The first of these described is the reflective system, whereby STBs are viewed from a self-regulation perspective and thusly considered as maladaptive coping behavior to perceived discrepancies regarding important goals. Applying a feedback-based view such as this to STBs provides a deeper understanding into underlying psychological processes involved in the development of STBs. The second system described by the DSMS is the impulsive system. Here, STBs are seen as a maladaptive self-organizing pattern that gets activated in high-risk situations of acute stress, negative affect, and when resources of the reflective system are depleted. In this context, the DSMS is informed by a strength model of self-regulation, which assumes that self-regulation resources are limited, an aspect with important theoretical and clinical implications for the development of STBs. In order to demonstrate the theoretical and practical utility of the DSMS, this review draws mainly on studies using ecological momentary assessment (EMA), a technology that allows to investigate moment-to-moment changes in STBs, and is therefore well suited for capturing the complex interplay of self-regulatory and impulsive processes proposed by the DSMS. The application of a dual-system framework to suicide research represents an innovative and integrative approach for expanding our knowledge about fundamental processes and how their dynamics lead to STBs. The usefulness of the DSMS, implications for future suicide research with EMA, and clinical implications are discussed.

摘要

在构思到行动的框架内,现有的自杀想法和行为(STB)理论主要关注自杀风险的线性进展。然而,这忽视了越来越多的证据表明,许多有自杀行为的人并不将他们的自杀企图视为有计划的行动,在某些情况下甚至否认曾有过任何自杀想法。此外,最近的研究发现,不同人之间的风险因素存在很大差异,这反映在各种自杀途径中。考虑到STB的高度变异性,需要新的创新理论概念和评估方法来推进我们对多种自杀途径的理解。在本综述中,我们将双系统框架应用于自杀行为,即自杀行为双系统模型(DSMS),该模型解释了两种不同的信息处理和行为系统。其中第一个描述的是反思系统,据此,STB从自我调节的角度来看待,因此被视为对重要目标方面感知到的差异的适应不良应对行为。将这样一种基于反馈的观点应用于STB,可以更深入地理解STB发展过程中所涉及的潜在心理过程。DSMS描述的第二个系统是冲动系统。在这里,STB被视为一种适应不良的自组织模式,在急性应激、负面情绪的高风险情况下以及反思系统资源耗尽时被激活。在这种背景下,DSMS以自我调节的强度模型为依据,该模型假设自我调节资源是有限的,这一方面对STB的发展具有重要的理论和临床意义。为了证明DSMS的理论和实际效用,本综述主要借鉴了使用生态瞬时评估(EMA)的研究,这是一种能够研究STB的瞬间变化的技术,因此非常适合捕捉DSMS提出的自我调节和冲动过程的复杂相互作用。将双系统框架应用于自杀研究代表了一种创新和综合的方法,用于扩展我们对基本过程及其动态如何导致STB的认识。本文讨论了DSMS的有用性、对未来使用EMA进行自杀研究的意义以及临床意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ded4/9742465/44a655b6accc/fpsyt-13-899500-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验