Cheon Yong-Il, Shin Sung-Chan, Lee Minhyung, Sung Eui-Suk, Lee Jin-Choon, Kim Mijin, Kim Bo Hyun, Kim In Ju, Lee Byung-Joo
Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, Pusan National University and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea.
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, Pusan National University and Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea.
Gland Surg. 2022 Nov;11(11):1744-1753. doi: 10.21037/gs-22-326.
The surgical extent of 1-4 cm papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is controversial. We aimed to determine the current trend in the extent of thyroidectomy and prophylactic central neck dissection (pCND) for 1.5 and 2.5 cm PTC, which are the most clinically controversial sizes.
The questionnaire was sent to 342 Korean Society of Head and Neck Surgery and 160 one branch of Korean Endocrine Society members from June to July 2021 by e-mail. A questionnaire included extent of thyroidectomy [hemithyroidectomy (Hemi) . total thyroidectomy (TT)] and pCND according to the tumor location and degree of extrathyroidal extension (ETE) at 1.5 or 2.5 cm PTC. We compared the proportion of respondents' preference for each scenario.
Fifty-seven of 342 surgeons and twenty-seven of 160 endocrinologists responded to the questionnaire. At 1.5 and 2.5 cm PTC without ETE, both groups preferred Hemi, and there was no difference between the groups. When 1.5 or 2.5 cm PTC with anterior minimal ETE was suspected, the preference for Hemi by endocrinologists was significantly lower than that by surgeons (P<0.05). When anterior and posterior gross ETE were suspected, TT was preferred in both groups. When anterior gross ETE was suspected, the preference for Hemi by endocrinologists was significantly lower than that by surgeons (P<0.05). There was no difference between the groups in the posterior gross ETE. Surgeons preferred Hemi and endocrinologists preferred TT for a 1.5 cm PTC located in the isthmus. The pCND showed a similar pattern in both groups according to the size and location of the tumor and the degree of ETE. The proportion of Hemi did not differ between high-experience and low-experience endocrinologists. Also, there was no significant difference in preference for surgical extent between low-volume and high-volume surgeons.
TT was frequently preferred in tumors with a large size or gross ETE, and pCND was frequently preferred in cases of suspected gross ETE. This study shows as the extent of thyroid surgery may differ between endocrinologists and surgeons and this could be confusing to patient and affect the patient outcomes. Therefore, multidisciplinary approach considering the extent of surgery for thyroid cancer is recommended.
1-4厘米的甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)的手术范围存在争议。我们旨在确定针对1.5厘米和2.5厘米PTC(这是临床上最具争议的大小)进行甲状腺切除术和预防性中央区颈淋巴结清扫术(pCND)范围的当前趋势。
2021年6月至7月,通过电子邮件向342名韩国头颈外科学会会员和160名韩国内分泌学会一个分会的会员发送了调查问卷。问卷包括根据1.5厘米或2.5厘米PTC的肿瘤位置和甲状腺外扩展(ETE)程度进行的甲状腺切除术范围[半甲状腺切除术(Hemi)、全甲状腺切除术(TT)]和pCND。我们比较了受访者对每种情况的偏好比例。
342名外科医生中的57名和160名内分泌科医生中的27名回复了问卷。在1.5厘米和2.5厘米且无ETE的PTC中,两组均倾向于选择半甲状腺切除术,且两组之间无差异。当怀疑1.5厘米或2.5厘米PTC伴有前部轻度ETE时,内分泌科医生对半甲状腺切除术的偏好显著低于外科医生(P<0.05)。当怀疑有前部和后部明显ETE时,两组均倾向于选择全甲状腺切除术。当怀疑有前部明显ETE时,内分泌科医生对半甲状腺切除术的偏好显著低于外科医生(P<0.05)。在后部明显ETE方面,两组之间无差异。对于位于峡部的1.5厘米PTC,外科医生倾向于半甲状腺切除术,而内分泌科医生倾向于全甲状腺切除术。根据肿瘤的大小和位置以及ETE程度,两组在pCND方面表现出相似的模式。高经验和低经验内分泌科医生在半甲状腺切除术的比例上没有差异。此外,低手术量和高手术量外科医生在手术范围偏好上也没有显著差异。
对于大尺寸或明显ETE的肿瘤,全甲状腺切除术更常被首选;对于怀疑有明显ETE的病例,预防性中央区颈淋巴结清扫术更常被首选。本研究表明,内分泌科医生和外科医生在甲状腺手术范围上可能存在差异,这可能会使患者感到困惑并影响患者的治疗结果。因此,建议采用考虑甲状腺癌手术范围的多学科方法。