Cheng Ivy, Sasegbon Ayodele, Hamdy Shaheen
Centre for Gastrointestinal Sciences, Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Gastroenterology, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2023 Aug;35(8):e14517. doi: 10.1111/nmo.14517. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
The majority of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) develop oropharyngeal dysphagia during the course of their disease. However, the efficacy of dysphagia treatments for these patients remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate treatment efficacy based on the evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
Five electronic databases were systematically searched from inception date to April 2022. Two reviewers independently extracted and analyzed the data. The outcome measures were changes in swallowing-related characteristics based on instrumental swallowing assessments.
An initial search identified 187 RCT studies of relevance. After screening, nine studies with a total sample size of 286 were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled effect size for all dysphagia treatments compared with control comparators was significant and medium (SMD [95% CI] = 0.58 [0.22, 0.94], p = 0.001; I = 50%). Subgroup analysis revealed a significant and medium pooled effect size for stimulation treatments (brain stimulation, peripheral neurostimulation and acupuncture) (SMD [95% CI] = 0.54 [0.15, 0.92]; p = 0.006; I = 22%). Specifically, the effect sizes for the single RCTs on neuromuscular stimulation (SMD [95% CI] = 1.58 [0.49, 2.86]; p = 0.005) and acupuncture (SMD [95% CI] = 0.82 [0.27, 1.37]; p = 0.003) were significant and large.
Our results showed that overall, dysphagia treatments, particularly stimulation treatments, can potentially benefit PD patients. However, given the limited number of small RCTs for each type of treatment, the evidence remains weak and uncertain. Further large-scale, multicenter RCTs are warranted to fully explore their clinical efficacy in the PD population.
大多数帕金森病(PD)患者在病程中会出现口咽吞咽困难。然而,针对这些患者的吞咽困难治疗效果仍存在争议。因此,我们进行了这项系统评价和荟萃分析,以根据随机对照试验(RCT)的证据评估治疗效果。
从数据库建立至2022年4月,对五个电子数据库进行系统检索。两名研究者独立提取和分析数据。结局指标是基于仪器吞咽评估的吞咽相关特征变化。
初步检索确定了187项相关的RCT研究。筛选后,9项研究共286名参与者被纳入荟萃分析。与对照相比,所有吞咽困难治疗的合并效应量显著且为中等(标准化均数差[95%可信区间]=0.58[0.22,0.94],p=0.001;I²=50%)。亚组分析显示,刺激治疗(脑刺激、外周神经刺激和针灸)的合并效应量显著且为中等(标准化均数差[95%可信区间]=0.54[0.15,0.92];p=0.006;I²=22%)。具体而言,单项RCT中神经肌肉刺激(标准化均数差[95%可信区间]=1.58[0.49,2.86];p=0.005)和针灸(标准化均数差[95%可信区间]=0.82[0.27,1.37];p=0.003)的效应量显著且较大。
我们的结果表明,总体而言,吞咽困难治疗,尤其是刺激治疗,可能使PD患者受益。然而,鉴于每种治疗方法的小型RCT数量有限,证据仍然薄弱且不确定。有必要进行进一步的大规模、多中心RCT,以充分探索其在PD患者中的临床疗效。