Suppr超能文献

采用核型分析和 QF-PCR 对散发性早孕期流产标本进行细胞遗传学分析:一项回顾性罗马尼亚队列研究。

Cytogenetic Analysis of Sporadic First-Trimester Miscarriage Specimens Using Karyotyping and QF-PCR: A Retrospective Romanian Cohort Study.

机构信息

Doctoral School, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania.

Laboratory of Human Genomics, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200638 Craiova, Romania.

出版信息

Genes (Basel). 2022 Nov 29;13(12):2246. doi: 10.3390/genes13122246.

Abstract

It is well known that first-trimester miscarriages are associated with chromosome abnormalities, with numerical chromosome abnormalities being the ones most commonly detected. Conventional karyotyping is still considered the gold standard in the analysis of products of conception, despite the extended use of molecular genetic techniques. However, conventional karyotyping is a laborious and time-consuming method, with a limited resolution of 5-10 Mb and hampered by maternal cell contamination and culture failure. The aim of our study was to assess the type and frequency of chromosomal abnormalities detected by conventional karyotyping in specimens of sporadic first-trimester miscarriages in a Romanian cohort, using QF-PCR to exclude maternal cell contamination. Long-term cultures were established and standard protocols were applied for cell harvesting, slide preparation, and GTG banding. All samples with 46,XX karyotype were tested for maternal cell contamination by QF-PCR, comparing multiple microsatellite markers in maternal blood with cell culture and tissue samples. Out of the initial 311 specimens collected from patients with sporadic first-trimester miscarriages, a total of 230 samples were successfully analyzed after the exclusion of 81 specimens based on unsuitable sampling, culture failure, or QF-PCR-proven maternal cell contamination. Chromosome abnormalities were detected in 135 cases (58.7%), with the most common type being single autosomal trisomy (71/135-52.6%), followed by monosomy (monosomy X being the only one detected, 24/135-17.8%), and polyploidy (23/135-17.0%). The subgroup analysis based on maternal age showed a statistically significant higher rate of single trisomy for women aged 35 years or older (40.3%) compared to the young maternal age group (26.1%) ( = 0.029). In conclusion, the combination of conventional karyotyping and QF-PCR can lead to an increased chromosome abnormality detection rate in first-trimester miscarriages. Our study provides reliable information for the genetic counseling of patients with first-trimester miscarriages, and further large-scale studies using different genetic techniques are required.

摘要

众所周知,早孕期流产与染色体异常有关,其中数目异常染色体最为常见。尽管分子遗传学技术得到了广泛应用,但传统核型分析仍然被认为是分析妊娠产物的金标准。然而,传统核型分析是一种繁琐且耗时的方法,分辨率有限(5-10Mb),并且受到母体细胞污染和培养失败的限制。我们的研究旨在评估在罗马尼亚队列中,通过 QF-PCR 排除母体细胞污染后,常规核型分析在散发性早孕期流产标本中检测到的染色体异常的类型和频率。建立了长期培养,并应用标准方案进行细胞收获、载玻片制备和 GTG 带型分析。所有具有 46,XX 核型的样本均通过 QF-PCR 进行母体细胞污染检测,比较了母体血液中的多个微卫星标记与细胞培养和组织样本。在从早孕期流产患者中收集的 311 个初始标本中,总共排除了 81 个标本,这些标本基于不合适的采样、培养失败或 QF-PCR 证实的母体细胞污染。在 230 个成功分析的样本中,有 135 个(58.7%)发现染色体异常,最常见的类型是单条常染色体三体(71/135-52.6%),其次是单体(仅检测到单体 X,24/135-17.8%)和多倍体(23/135-17.0%)。基于母体年龄的亚组分析显示,年龄在 35 岁或以上的女性中,单条三体的发生率明显高于年轻母体年龄组(40.3%比 26.1%)( = 0.029)。总之,常规核型分析和 QF-PCR 的结合可以提高早孕期流产中染色体异常的检测率。我们的研究为早孕期流产患者的遗传咨询提供了可靠的信息,需要进一步使用不同的遗传技术进行大规模研究。

相似文献

8
[Chorionic villus cell culture and karyotype analysis in 1 983 cases of spontaneous miscarriage].
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Jul 25;52(7):461-466. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567X.2017.07.006.
9
Incidence and Spectrum of Chromosome Abnormalities in Miscarriage Samples: A Retrospective Study of 330 Cases.
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2019;158(4):171-183. doi: 10.1159/000502304. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
10
Maternal age, history of miscarriage, and embryonic/fetal size are associated with cytogenetic results of spontaneous early miscarriages.
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019 Apr;36(4):749-757. doi: 10.1007/s10815-019-01415-y. Epub 2019 Feb 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Chromosome Abnormality Detection Rates of QF-PCR in Early Pregnancy Loss.
Curr Health Sci J. 2025 Jan-Mar;51(1):62-71. doi: 10.12865/CHSJ.51.01.06. Epub 2025 Mar 31.
2
Genome-Wide Cell-Free DNA Analysis for Aneuploidy Detection in Miscarriages: Test Performance Meta-Analysis.
Prenat Diagn. 2025 Jul;45(8):957-967. doi: 10.1002/pd.6824. Epub 2025 May 27.
3
Chromosomal Abnormalities in Early Pregnancy Losses: A Study of 900 Samples.
Balkan J Med Genet. 2024 Mar 12;26(2):11-20. doi: 10.2478/bjmg-2023-0014. eCollection 2023 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Epigenetic changes occur in placentas of spontaneous and recurrent miscarriages.
J Reprod Immunol. 2022 Feb;149:103466. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2021.103466. Epub 2021 Dec 14.
3
Genetic analysis of products of conception. Should we abandon classic karyotyping methodology?
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2021 Jun 18;19:eAO5945. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2021AO5945. eCollection 2021.
4
Cytogenetic Analysis of the Products of Conception After Spontaneous Abortion in the First Trimester.
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2021;161(3-4):120-131. doi: 10.1159/000514088. Epub 2021 May 11.
5
Genetics of recurrent pregnancy loss: a review.
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Apr 1;33(2):106-111. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000695.
6
Chromosomal copy number analysis of products of conception by conventional karyotyping and next-generation sequencing.
Reprod Med Biol. 2020 Oct 8;20(1):71-75. doi: 10.1002/rmb2.12351. eCollection 2021 Jan.
7
Genetic findings in miscarriages and their relation to the number of previous miscarriages.
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 Jun;303(6):1425-1432. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05859-x. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
8
Association between fetal chromosomal abnormalities and the frequency of spontaneous abortions.
Exp Ther Med. 2020 Apr;19(4):2505-2510. doi: 10.3892/etm.2020.8524. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
9
Comparative Cytogenetic Analysis of Spontaneous Abortions in Recurrent and Sporadic Pregnancy Losses.
Biomed Hub. 2016 Apr 27;1(1):1-11. doi: 10.1159/000446099. eCollection 2016 Jan-Apr.
10
Genome Sequencing Explores Complexity of Chromosomal Abnormalities in Recurrent Miscarriage.
Am J Hum Genet. 2019 Dec 5;105(6):1102-1111. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.10.003. Epub 2019 Oct 31.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验