Suppr超能文献

游离细胞 DNA 检测罕见染色体异常的临床、细胞遗传学和分子细胞遗传学结果。

Clinical, Cytogenetic and Molecular Cytogenetic Outcomes of Cell-Free DNA Testing for Rare Chromosomal Anomalies.

机构信息

Department of Medical Genetics, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul 34093, Turkey.

Center for Genetic Diagnosis and Research PREMED, Istanbul 34394, Turkey.

出版信息

Genes (Basel). 2022 Dec 16;13(12):2389. doi: 10.3390/genes13122389.

Abstract

The scope of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing was expanded to the genome, which allowed screening for rare chromosome anomalies (RCAs). Since the efficiency of the test for RCAs remains below the common aneuploidies, there is a debate on the usage of expanded tests. This study focuses on the confirmatory and follow-up data of cases with positive cfDNA testing for RCAs and cases with screen-negative results in a series of 912 consecutive cases that underwent invasive testing following cfDNA testing. Chorion villus sampling (CVS), amniocentesis (AS), fetal blood sampling, and term placenta samples were investigated using classical cytogenetic and molecular cytogenetic techniques. Out of 593 screen-positive results, 504 (85%) were for common aneuploidies, 40 (6.7%) for rare autosomal trisomies (RATs), and 49 (8.3%) for structural chromosome anomalies (SAs). Of the screen-positives for RATs, 20 cases were evaluated only in fetal tissue, and confined placental mosaicism (CPM) could not be excluded. Among cases with definitive results ( = 20), the rates of true positives, placental mosaics, and false positives were 35%, 45%, and 10%, respectively. Among screen-positives for SAs, 32.7% were true positives. The confirmation rate was higher for duplications than deletions (58.3% vs. 29.4%). The rate of chromosomal abnormality was 10.9% in the group of 256 screen-negatives with pathological ultrasound findings. This study provides further data to assess the efficiency of expanded cfDNA testing for RATs and SAs. The test efficiency for cfDNA seems to be higher for duplications than for deletions, which is evidence of the role of expert ultrasound in identifying pregnancies at increased risk for chromosome anomalies, even in pregnancies with screen-negatives. Furthermore, we discussed the efficiency of CVS vs. AC in screen-positives for RATs.

摘要

游离 DNA(cfDNA)检测的范围扩展到基因组,从而可以筛查罕见的染色体异常(RCA)。由于检测 RCA 的效率仍低于常见的非整倍体,因此对于扩展检测的使用存在争议。本研究关注的是在一系列 912 例连续接受 cfDNA 检测后进行侵袭性检测的病例中,cfDNA 检测阳性 RCA 病例和筛查阴性结果病例的确认和随访数据。使用经典细胞遗传学和分子细胞遗传学技术对绒毛膜绒毛取样(CVS)、羊膜穿刺术(AS)、胎儿血液取样和足月胎盘样本进行了研究。在 593 例筛查阳性结果中,504 例(85%)为常见非整倍体,40 例(6.7%)为罕见常染色体三体(RAT),49 例(8.3%)为结构性染色体异常(SA)。在筛查阳性的 RAT 中,20 例仅在胎儿组织中进行了评估,不能排除局限性胎盘嵌合体(CPM)。在有明确结果的病例(=20)中,真阳性、胎盘嵌合体和假阳性的比例分别为 35%、45%和 10%。在筛查阳性的 SA 中,32.7%为真阳性。与缺失相比,重复的确认率更高(58.3%比 29.4%)。在 256 例超声检查结果异常的筛查阴性组中,染色体异常的发生率为 10.9%。本研究提供了进一步的数据来评估扩展 cfDNA 检测对 RAT 和 SA 的效率。cfDNA 检测的效率似乎对重复比缺失更高,这表明专家超声在识别染色体异常风险增加的妊娠方面发挥了作用,即使在筛查阴性的妊娠中也是如此。此外,我们还讨论了在 RAT 筛查阳性中 CVS 与 AC 的效率。

相似文献

3
Cytogenetic outcomes following a failed cell-free DNA screen: a population-based retrospective cohort study of 35,146 singleton pregnancies.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Aug;229(2):168.e1-168.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.01.007. Epub 2023 Jan 7.
7
Positive predictive value estimates for cell-free noninvasive prenatal screening from data of a large referral genetic diagnostic laboratory.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Dec;217(6):691.e1-691.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.10.005. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
8
Diagnostic testing after positive results on cell free DNA screening: CVS or Amnio?
Prenat Diagn. 2021 Sep;41(10):1249-1254. doi: 10.1002/pd.6021. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
9
Should cell-free DNA testing be used in pregnancy with increased fetal nuchal translucency?
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 May;55(5):645-651. doi: 10.1002/uog.20397. Epub 2020 Apr 7.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Screening for Fetal Chromosomal Abnormalities: ACOG Practice Bulletin Summary, Number 226.
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Oct;136(4):859-867. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004107.
3
Applying high-throughput sequencing to identify and evaluate foetal chromosomal deletion and duplication.
J Cell Mol Med. 2020 Sep;24(17):9936-9944. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.15593. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
5
Current use of noninvasive prenatal testing in Europe, Australia and the USA: A graphical presentation.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020 Jun;99(6):722-730. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13841. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
6
Social and medical need for whole genome high resolution NIPT.
Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2020 Jan;8(1):e1062. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.1062. Epub 2019 Dec 1.
8
TRIDENT-2: National Implementation of Genome-wide Non-invasive Prenatal Testing as a First-Tier Screening Test in the Netherlands.
Am J Hum Genet. 2019 Dec 5;105(6):1091-1101. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.10.005. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
9
The clinical benefit of genome-wide cfDNA testing cannot be extrapolated from CVS data.
Genet Med. 2020 Mar;22(3):657-658. doi: 10.1038/s41436-019-0689-5. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
10
Outcomes in pregnancies with a confined placental mosaicism and implications for prenatal screening using cell-free DNA.
Genet Med. 2020 Feb;22(2):309-316. doi: 10.1038/s41436-019-0630-y. Epub 2019 Aug 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验