Department of Medical Genetics, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul 34093, Turkey.
Center for Genetic Diagnosis and Research PREMED, Istanbul 34394, Turkey.
Genes (Basel). 2022 Dec 16;13(12):2389. doi: 10.3390/genes13122389.
The scope of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing was expanded to the genome, which allowed screening for rare chromosome anomalies (RCAs). Since the efficiency of the test for RCAs remains below the common aneuploidies, there is a debate on the usage of expanded tests. This study focuses on the confirmatory and follow-up data of cases with positive cfDNA testing for RCAs and cases with screen-negative results in a series of 912 consecutive cases that underwent invasive testing following cfDNA testing. Chorion villus sampling (CVS), amniocentesis (AS), fetal blood sampling, and term placenta samples were investigated using classical cytogenetic and molecular cytogenetic techniques. Out of 593 screen-positive results, 504 (85%) were for common aneuploidies, 40 (6.7%) for rare autosomal trisomies (RATs), and 49 (8.3%) for structural chromosome anomalies (SAs). Of the screen-positives for RATs, 20 cases were evaluated only in fetal tissue, and confined placental mosaicism (CPM) could not be excluded. Among cases with definitive results ( = 20), the rates of true positives, placental mosaics, and false positives were 35%, 45%, and 10%, respectively. Among screen-positives for SAs, 32.7% were true positives. The confirmation rate was higher for duplications than deletions (58.3% vs. 29.4%). The rate of chromosomal abnormality was 10.9% in the group of 256 screen-negatives with pathological ultrasound findings. This study provides further data to assess the efficiency of expanded cfDNA testing for RATs and SAs. The test efficiency for cfDNA seems to be higher for duplications than for deletions, which is evidence of the role of expert ultrasound in identifying pregnancies at increased risk for chromosome anomalies, even in pregnancies with screen-negatives. Furthermore, we discussed the efficiency of CVS vs. AC in screen-positives for RATs.
游离 DNA(cfDNA)检测的范围扩展到基因组,从而可以筛查罕见的染色体异常(RCA)。由于检测 RCA 的效率仍低于常见的非整倍体,因此对于扩展检测的使用存在争议。本研究关注的是在一系列 912 例连续接受 cfDNA 检测后进行侵袭性检测的病例中,cfDNA 检测阳性 RCA 病例和筛查阴性结果病例的确认和随访数据。使用经典细胞遗传学和分子细胞遗传学技术对绒毛膜绒毛取样(CVS)、羊膜穿刺术(AS)、胎儿血液取样和足月胎盘样本进行了研究。在 593 例筛查阳性结果中,504 例(85%)为常见非整倍体,40 例(6.7%)为罕见常染色体三体(RAT),49 例(8.3%)为结构性染色体异常(SA)。在筛查阳性的 RAT 中,20 例仅在胎儿组织中进行了评估,不能排除局限性胎盘嵌合体(CPM)。在有明确结果的病例(=20)中,真阳性、胎盘嵌合体和假阳性的比例分别为 35%、45%和 10%。在筛查阳性的 SA 中,32.7%为真阳性。与缺失相比,重复的确认率更高(58.3%比 29.4%)。在 256 例超声检查结果异常的筛查阴性组中,染色体异常的发生率为 10.9%。本研究提供了进一步的数据来评估扩展 cfDNA 检测对 RAT 和 SA 的效率。cfDNA 检测的效率似乎对重复比缺失更高,这表明专家超声在识别染色体异常风险增加的妊娠方面发挥了作用,即使在筛查阴性的妊娠中也是如此。此外,我们还讨论了在 RAT 筛查阳性中 CVS 与 AC 的效率。