Xu Hui, Han Yan-Jing, Gao Yong-Hui, Liu Wan-Ning, Gao Qi
Institute of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China.
Zhen Ci Yan Jiu. 2022 Dec 25;47(12):1123-9. doi: 10.13702/j.1000-0607.20220766.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the diversities in the literature characteristics of animal experiments with acupuncture and moxibustion (acu-moxibustion) published in both Chinese and English, so as to summarize the similarities and differences in the reporting content for the animal experiment research with acu-moxibustion in the journals at home and abroad. METHODS: The articles of animal experiments with acu-moxibustion published from 2016 to 2018 were searched from CNKI, Wanfang, SinoMed, PubMed and Web of Science databases. The articles were screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the database was established by importing the essential information, e.g. title, author, journal, impact factor, country, year of publication, citation frequency, funding, disease type, as well as the number of observation indicators and charts. The diversity was initially summarized among this type of articles between China and foreign countries. RESULTS: A total of 7 515 articles of animal experiments with acu-moxibustion were retrieved and 2 458 articles were eligible in compliance with the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of them, there were 1 827 articles in Chinese and 631 in English. (1) Among those of Chinese-version, 169 articles (9.25%) were published in , listed the first of the article publications. Regarding the impact factor of published journal, was ranked the highest (3.187). For those published in English, 78 articles (12.36%) were published in , listed the top of the article publications. Gastroenterology occupied the highest in terms of the impact factor (17.373) of published journal. (2) The first authors of Chinese-version articles were all from China, distributing in 461 institutions; of which, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine occupied the top for article publications (142 articles, 7.77%). For the English articles, 16 countries were involved regarding the first authors, and the most of them were from China (523 articles, 82.88%), followed by South Korea, Brazil, the United States and Japan. (3) The frequency of citations of Chinese articles was 7.50, which was significantly higher than that of English ones (4.61). (4) The funding supported Chinese and English articles were 1 680 (91.95%) and 569 (90.17%) respectively. (5) In the aspects of disease name and animal model, 135 and 220 diseases were included in Chinese and English articles respectively. The common top 10 diseases referred to 8 categories, i.e. stroke-related diseases, arthritis, Alzheimer's disease, depression, diabetes, spinal cord injury, hypertension and obesity. (6) In terms of the number of indicators, the maximum number was 6 for Chinese-version articles, averagely 2.46, while, it was 12 for English-version ones, 4.02 in average. (7) Among the articles of Chinese-version, the maximum number of charts was 17, and 1 028 articles had 2 to 4 charts, accounting the largest proportion (56.27%). Among those of English-version, the top number of charts was 27, and 347 articles had 4 to 6 charts, occupying the largest proportion (54.99%). CONCLUSION: The number of Chinese-version articles for acu-moxibustion experiment research is much higher than that of the English ones, the authorship is led by Chinese and most of the researches are supported by funds. There is less difference in the disease types between Chinese and English articles, but the frequency citation of Chinese articles is obviously higher than that of English ones; while, the numbers of observation indicators and charts in English articles are much more than those of Chinese ones. It is suggested that the great attention has been drawn on the acu-moxibustion experiment researches published in Chinese journals, and the reports of the researches are more complete in English journals.
目的:比较中英文发表的针灸动物实验文献特征的差异,总结国内外期刊针灸动物实验研究报告内容的异同。 方法:从中国知网、万方、中国生物医学文献数据库、PubMed及Web of Science数据库检索2016年至2018年发表的针灸动物实验文章。根据纳入和排除标准进行筛选,并导入文章的基本信息,如标题、作者、期刊、影响因子、国家、发表年份、被引频次、基金资助、疾病类型以及观察指标和图表数量等建立数据库。初步总结国内外此类文章之间的差异。 结果:共检索到7515篇针灸动物实验文章,符合纳入和排除标准的有2458篇。其中中文文章1827篇,英文文章631篇。(1)中文文章中,169篇(9.25%)发表于《针刺研究》,位列文章发表数量之首。就发表期刊的影响因子而言,《针刺研究》最高(3.187)。英文文章中,78篇(12.36%)发表于《胃肠病学》,位列文章发表数量之首。就发表期刊的影响因子而言,《胃肠病学》最高(17.373)。(2)中文文章的第一作者均来自中国,分布于461个机构;其中,北京中医药大学文章发表数量最多(142篇,7.77%)。英文文章的第一作者涉及16个国家,其中中国最多(523篇,82.88%),其次是韩国、巴西、美国和日本。(3)中文文章的被引频次为7.50,显著高于英文文章(4.61)。(4)获得基金资助的中文和英文文章分别为1680篇(91.95%)和569篇(90.17%)。(5)在疾病名称和动物模型方面,中文文章纳入135种疾病,英文文章纳入220种疾病。中英文文章共同提及的前10种常见疾病涉及8类,即中风相关疾病、关节炎、阿尔茨海默病、抑郁症、糖尿病、脊髓损伤、高血压和肥胖症。(6)在指标数量方面,中文文章最多为6个,平均为2.46个;而英文文章最多为12个,平均为4.02个。(7)中文文章中,图表最多为17个,1028篇文章有2至4个图表,占比最大(56.27%)。英文文章中,图表最多为27个,347篇文章有4至6个图表,占比最大(54.99%)。 结论:针灸实验研究中文文章数量远多于英文文章,作者以中国人为主,且大部分研究有基金资助。中英文文章疾病类型差异较小,但中文文章被引频次明显高于英文文章;而英文文章观察指标和图表数量远多于中文文章。提示国内期刊对针灸实验研究关注度高,英文期刊研究报告更完整。
Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2017-8-12
Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2007-10