R Kiran, Bhargava Madhavi
Yenepoya Medical College, Yenepoya University, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India.
Center for Nutrition Studies, Yenepoya (Deemed to be University), Mangaluru, Karnataka, India.
Heliyon. 2022 Dec 9;8(12):e12173. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12173. eCollection 2022 Dec.
There are many anthropometric techniques to screen for overweight-obesity like the body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), and waist-hip ratio (WHR). These may be difficult or less acceptable in community and outpatient settings. We determine the cut-offs of mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) and neck-circumference (NC) to screen overweight (BMI ≥25 kg/m), abdominal obesity by waist circumference (WC; men: ≥90 cm; women: ≥80 cm) and high percent body fat (PBF) (men: ≥20%; women: ≥30%) and explore participant preference for various anthropometric methods.
ology: We enrolled 282 medical students in South India and performed anthropometry (height, weight, WC, MUAC and NC), bio-impedance analysis (BIA, Inbody 770) to detect PBF. Receiver operator curves were generated and best cut-offs derived using highest Youden Index (sensitivity + specificity-1).
Of the 282 participants, 83 (29.4%) were overweight, 113 (38.7%) had abdominal obesity and 186 (66%) had higher PBF. The MUAC cut-off was 31.3cm for men (sensitivity: 86%; specificity: 74%) to detect overweight and 31.2 cm (sensitivity: 85%; specificity: 73%) to detect abdominal obesity. The corresponding cut-offs in women were 28.5 cm (sensitivity:88%; specificity: 83%) to detect overweight and 28.3 cm (sensitivity: 74%; specificity: 92%) for abdominal obesity. For NC, the proposed cut-off in men was 36.6 cm (sensitivity: 81%; specificity: 82%) for overweight and 37.1 cm (sensitivity:78%; specificity:82%) for abdominal obesity. In women, this was 31.4 cm for both overweight as per BMI (sensitivity: 88%; specificity: 71%) and for abdominal obesity (sensitivity: 75%; specificity: 81%). Neck circumference was preferred by 225 (79.8%) participants.
Both MUAC and NC can be considered for screening overweight and abdominal obesity with good sensitivity and specificity but their sensitivity and specificity for screening high PFB were not very good. Neck circumference was the most preferred anthropometric method.
有许多人体测量技术可用于筛查超重和肥胖,如身体质量指数(BMI)、腰围(WC)和腰臀比(WHR)。在社区和门诊环境中,这些方法可能难以实施或不太容易被接受。我们确定了上臂中部周长(MUAC)和颈围(NC)的切点,以筛查超重(BMI≥25kg/m²)、通过腰围筛查腹部肥胖(WC;男性:≥90cm;女性:≥80cm)以及高体脂百分比(PBF)(男性:≥20%;女性:≥30%),并探讨参与者对各种人体测量方法的偏好。
我们招募了印度南部的282名医学生,进行了人体测量(身高、体重、WC、MUAC和NC)以及生物电阻抗分析(BIA,Inbody 770)以检测PBF。生成了受试者工作特征曲线,并使用最高约登指数(灵敏度+特异度-1)得出最佳切点。
在282名参与者中,83人(29.4%)超重,113人(38.7%)有腹部肥胖,186人(66%)有较高的PBF。男性检测超重的MUAC切点为31.3cm(灵敏度:86%;特异度:74%),检测腹部肥胖的切点为31.2cm(灵敏度:85%;特异度:73%)。女性检测超重的相应切点为28.5cm(灵敏度:88%;特异度:83%),检测腹部肥胖的切点为28.3cm(灵敏度:74%;特异度:92%)。对于NC,男性超重的建议切点为36.6cm(灵敏度:81%;特异度:8