Wang Hsiu-Jen, Kuo Hann-Chorng
Department of Urology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Hualien, Taiwan.
Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chi Mei Medical Center, Liouying, Tainan, Taiwan.
Tzu Chi Med J. 2021 Feb 6;34(4):441-447. doi: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_264_20. eCollection 2022 Oct-Dec.
This study retrospectively investigated the influence of urodynamic parameters and patient characteristics on success rates among patients with overactive bladder (OAB) and urodynamic detrusor overactivity (DO).
Consecutive patients with OAB and urodynamic DO initially received solifenacin, mirabegron, or combination of both for 1-3 months. If failed, patients were switched to another OAB medication subtype or provided additional OAB medication for a total of 6 months. A successful treatment was defined as an improvement in urgency severity and a global response assessment of ≥1. Success rates after initial or modulated OAB medication were analyzed based on patient and urodynamic characteristics.
A total of 453 patients were enrolled, among whom 144, 255, and 54 received solifenacin, mirabegron, and combined medications, respectively. Among the patients, 259 (57.2%) had OAB dry and 194 (42.8%) had OAB wet. Patients receiving mirabegron alone had a significantly higher initial medication success rate compared to that of others. Patients with a phasic DO (50.7%), bladder outlet obstruction (BOO, 52.5%), and no central nervous system (CNS) lesions (47.5%) exhibited higher success rates than those with a terminal DO (42.0%), no BOO (42.7%), and CNS lesions (31.6%), respectively. After switching or modulating the initial OAB medication following treatment failure, 115 (62.2%) of 185 patients still showed improvement in OAB symptoms, with an overall success rate of 70.2% after 6 months of treatment.
Initial solifenacin or mirabegron treatment had a success rate of around 50%. In general, patients with a phasic DO, urodynamic BOO, and no CNS lesions have higher success rates than those with a terminal DO, no BOO, and CNS lesions, respectively. Success rates can further be improved by switching or modulating OAB medication.
本研究回顾性调查了尿动力学参数和患者特征对膀胱过度活动症(OAB)和尿动力学逼尿肌过度活动(DO)患者治疗成功率的影响。
连续入选的OAB和尿动力学DO患者最初接受索利那新、米拉贝隆或两者联合治疗1 - 3个月。若治疗失败,患者换用另一种OAB药物亚型或加用其他OAB药物,疗程共6个月。成功治疗定义为尿急严重程度改善且总体反应评估≥1。根据患者和尿动力学特征分析初始或调整OAB药物治疗后的成功率。
共纳入453例患者,其中144例、255例和54例分别接受索利那新、米拉贝隆和联合用药治疗。患者中,259例(57.2%)为OAB干性,194例(42.8%)为OAB湿性。单独接受米拉贝隆治疗的患者初始药物治疗成功率显著高于其他患者。伴有间歇性DO(50.7%)、膀胱出口梗阻(BOO,52.5%)且无中枢神经系统(CNS)病变(47.5%)的患者成功率分别高于伴有终末性DO(42.0%)、无BOO(42.7%)和CNS病变(31.6%)的患者。治疗失败后更换或调整初始OAB药物治疗后,185例患者中有115例(62.2%)OAB症状仍有改善,治疗6个月后的总体成功率为70.2%。
初始使用索利那新或米拉贝隆治疗的成功率约为50%。一般而言,伴有间歇性DO、尿动力学BOO且无CNS病变的患者成功率分别高于伴有终末性DO、无BOO和CNS病变的患者。更换或调整OAB药物可进一步提高成功率。