Suppr超能文献

一项随机对照试验的研究方案,旨在评估在言语识别得分不对称的患者中,使用骨锚式助听器和人工耳蜗联合助听与双侧助听器相比的获益。

Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial evaluating the benefits from bimodal solution with cochlear implant and hearing aid versus bilateral hearing aids in patients with asymmetric speech identification scores.

机构信息

Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Odense University Hospital, Odense C, Denmark

Department of Audiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense C, Denmark.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 29;12(12):e070296. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070296.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Cochlear implant (CI) and hearing aid (HA) in a bimodal solution (CI+HA) is compared with bilateral HAs (HA+HA) to test if the bimodal solution results in better speech intelligibility and self-reported quality of life.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This randomised controlled trial is conducted in Odense University Hospital, Denmark. Sixty adult bilateral HA users referred for CI surgery are enrolled if eligible and undergo: audiometry, speech perception in noise (HINT: Hearing in Noise Test), Speech Identification Scores and video head impulse test. All participants will receive new replacement HAs. After 1 month they will be randomly assigned (1:1) to the intervention group (CI+HA) or to the delayed intervention control group (HA+HA). The intervention group (CI+HA) will receive a CI on the ear with a poorer speech recognition score and continue using the HA on the other ear. The control group (HA+HA) will receive a CI after a total of 4 months of bilateral HA use.The primary outcome measures are speech intelligibility measured objectively with HINT (sentences in noise) and DANTALE I (words) and subjectively with the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing scale questionnaire. Secondary outcomes are patient reported Health-Related Quality of Life scores assessed with the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire, the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory and Dizziness Handicap Inventory. Third outcome is listening effort assessed with pupil dilation during HINT.In conclusion, the purpose is to improve the clinical decision-making for CI candidacy and optimise bimodal solutions.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee Southern Denmark project ID S-20200074G. All participants are required to sign an informed consent form.This study will be published on completion in peer-reviewed publications and scientific conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04919928.

摘要

简介:将人工耳蜗(CI)与助听器(HA)的双模解决方案(CI+HA)与双侧 HA(HA+HA)进行比较,以测试双模解决方案是否能提高言语可懂度和自我报告的生活质量。

方法和分析:本随机对照试验在丹麦奥胡斯大学医院进行。如果符合条件,将招募 60 名接受 CI 手术的成年双侧 HA 用户,并进行:听力测试、噪声下言语感知(HINT:噪声中的听力测试)、言语识别得分和视频头脉冲测试。所有参与者将获得新的替换 HA。1 个月后,他们将随机分配(1:1)到干预组(CI+HA)或延迟干预对照组(HA+HA)。干预组(CI+HA)将在言语识别得分较差的耳朵上植入 CI,并继续在另一只耳朵上使用 HA。对照组(HA+HA)将在双侧 HA 使用 4 个月后植入 CI。主要观察指标是使用 HINT(噪声中的句子)和 DANTALE I(单词)进行客观测量的言语可懂度,以及使用 Speech、Spatial 和 Hearing Quality Scale 问卷进行主观测量的言语可懂度。次要结果是使用 Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire、Tinnitus Handicap Inventory 和 Dizziness Handicap Inventory 评估患者报告的健康相关生活质量评分。第三个结果是使用 HINT 期间瞳孔扩张评估的听力努力。

结论:目的是改善 CI 候选资格的临床决策,并优化双模解决方案。

伦理和传播:本研究方案已获得南丹麦伦理委员会批准(项目 ID S-20200074G)。所有参与者均需签署知情同意书。研究完成后,将在同行评议的出版物和科学会议上发表。

试验注册号:NCT04919928。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c564/9806092/2e38afde7e5a/bmjopen-2022-070296f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验