School of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, Henan, China.
Department of Public Health, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan.
J Hypertens. 2023 Feb 1;41(2):271-279. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000003325. Epub 2022 Nov 16.
Little is known regarding the health effects of different hypertension phenotypes including isolated systolic hypertension (ISH), isolated diastolic hypertension (IDH), and systolic and diastolic hypertension (SDH) defined by the 2017 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) guideline among young adults. We conducted this longitudinal study using time-varying analyses to evaluate the relationship between cardiovascular/all-natural mortality risk and different hypertension phenotypes in young adults.
A total of 284 597 young adults (aged 18-39 years) were recruited between 1996 and 2016. Participants were classified into eight mutually exclusive BP groups: normal blood pressure (BP), elevated BP, stage 1 IDH, stage 1 ISH, stage 1 SDH, stage 2 IDH, stage 2 ISH, and stage 2 SDH. The outcomes were cardiovascular and all-natural mortality.
After a median follow-up of 15.8 years, 2341 all-natural deaths with 442 cardiovascular deaths were observed. When compared with individuals with normal BP, the multivariable adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) of cardiovascular mortality was 1.39 (1.01-1.93) for elevated BP, 2.00 (1.45-2.77) for stage 1 IDH, 1.66 (1.08-2.56) for stage 1 ISH, 3.08 (2.13-4.45) for stage 1 SDH, 2.85 (1.76-4.62) for stage 2 IDH, 4.30 (2.96-6.25) for stage 2 ISH, and 6.93 (4.99-9.61) for stage 2 SDH, respectively. In consideration to all-natural mortality, similar results were observed for stage 1 SDH, stage 2 ISH, and stage 2 SDH; but not for elevated BP, stage 1 IDH, stage 1 ISH, and stage 2 IDH.
Young adults with stage 1 or stage 2 ISH, IDH, and SDH are at increased risk of cardiovascular death than those with normal BP. Regardless of BP stage, SDH was associated with a higher cardiovascular mortality risk than IDH and ISH.
根据 2017 年美国心脏病学会(ACC)/美国心脏协会(AHA)指南,对于包括孤立性收缩期高血压(ISH)、孤立性舒张期高血压(IDH)和收缩期与舒张期高血压(SDH)在内的不同高血压表型,人们对其对年轻人健康的影响知之甚少。我们进行了这项纵向研究,使用时变分析来评估年轻人中不同高血压表型与心血管/全因死亡率风险之间的关系。
共纳入 1996 年至 2016 年间的 284597 名年龄在 18-39 岁的年轻人。参与者被分为八个互斥的血压组:正常血压(BP)、高血压前期、1 期 IDH、1 期 ISH、1 期 SDH、2 期 IDH、2 期 ISH 和 2 期 SDH。结局为心血管和全因死亡率。
中位随访 15.8 年后,观察到 2341 例全因死亡和 442 例心血管死亡。与正常血压者相比,多变量校正后的心血管死亡风险比(95%置信区间)为:高血压前期 1.39(1.01-1.93)、1 期 IDH 2.00(1.45-2.77)、1 期 ISH 1.66(1.08-2.56)、1 期 SDH 3.08(2.13-4.45)、2 期 IDH 2.85(1.76-4.62)、2 期 ISH 4.30(2.96-6.25)和 2 期 SDH 6.93(4.99-9.61)。考虑到全因死亡率,1 期 SDH、2 期 ISH 和 2 期 SDH 也观察到类似的结果;但高血压前期、1 期 IDH、1 期 ISH 和 2 期 IDH 则不然。
与正常血压者相比,1 期或 2 期 ISH、IDH 和 SDH 的年轻人发生心血管死亡的风险增加。无论血压阶段如何,SDH 与心血管死亡率风险的相关性均高于 IDH 和 ISH。