Laboratory of Collective Intelligence, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton L8S 2T6, ON, Canada.
Rev Neurosci. 2022 Dec 30;34(7):737-762. doi: 10.1515/revneuro-2022-0120. Print 2023 Oct 26.
This review explores several rarely discussed examples illustrating constructivism principles, generative and selective features of neuronal regulation of behaviour. First, the review highlights Walter Freeman's experiments and mathematical analysis that uncovered the existence of anticipatory attractors, non-random dynamical patterns in neurodynamics. Since Freeman's work did not extend to neurochemistry, this paper then points to the proposed earlier neurochemical framework summarizing the managerial roles of monoaminergic, cholinergic and opioid receptor systems likely contributing to anticipatory attractors in line with functional constructivism. As a third example, neurochemistry's evidence points to the "Throw & Catch" (T&C) principle in neurodynamics. This principle refers to the pro-active, neurochemically expensive, massive but topical increase of potentials ("Throw") within electrodynamics and neurotransmission in the brain whenever there is an uncertainty in selection of degrees of freedom (DFs). The T&C also underlines the relay-like processes during the selection of DFs. The "Throw" works as an internally generated "flashlight" that, contrarily to the expectations of entropy reduction, increases entropy and variance observed in processes related to orientation and action-formation. The discussed examples highlight the deficiency of structures-oriented projects and excitation-inhibition concepts in neuroscience. The neural regulation of behaviour appears to be a fluid, constructive process, constantly upgrading the choice of behavioural DFs, to ensure the compatibility between the environmental and individual's individuals' needs and capacities.
这篇综述探讨了几个很少被讨论的例子,说明了行为的神经元调节的建构主义原则、生成和选择性特征。首先,综述强调了 Walter Freeman 的实验和数学分析,这些实验和分析揭示了存在预期吸引子,即神经动力学中的非随机动力学模式。由于 Freeman 的工作没有扩展到神经化学,本文随后指出了更早提出的神经化学框架,该框架总结了单胺能、胆碱能和阿片受体系统的管理作用,可能有助于与功能建构主义一致的预期吸引子。作为第三个例子,神经化学的证据指向神经动力学中的“投掷与捕获”(T&C)原则。该原则是指在大脑中的电动力学和神经传递中,每当自由度(DFs)的选择存在不确定性时,就会主动地、神经化学上昂贵地、大规模地但集中地增加潜力(“投掷”)。T&C 还强调了在 DFs 选择过程中的中继样过程。“投掷”作为内部产生的“闪光灯”起作用,与熵减少的预期相反,它增加了与定向和动作形成相关的过程中观察到的熵和方差。讨论的例子强调了结构导向项目和神经科学中兴奋抑制概念的不足。行为的神经调节似乎是一个流畅的、建设性的过程,不断升级行为 DFs 的选择,以确保环境和个体的需求和能力之间的兼容性。