Suppr超能文献

急性缺血性卒中后射血分数降低且为窦性心律的心力衰竭患者抗血栓形成策略的相关结局

Outcomes associated with antithrombotic strategies in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and sinus rhythm following acute ischemic stroke.

作者信息

Patel Parth, Tiongson Justin, Chen Austin, Siegal Taylor, Oak Solomon, Golla Akhil, Kamen Scott, Thon Jesse M, Vigilante Nicholas, Rana Ameena, Hester Taryn, Siegler James E

机构信息

Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, NJ, United States.

Cooper Neurological Institute, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, NJ, United States.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2022 Dec 15;13:1041806. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1041806. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Insufficient data exist regarding the benefit of long-term antiplatelet vs. anticoagulant therapy in the prevention of recurrent ischemic stroke in patients with ischemic stroke and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Therefore, this study aimed to compare longitudinal outcomes associated with antiplatelet vs. anticoagulant use in a cohort of patients with stroke and with an ejection fraction of ≤40%.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed single-center registry data (2015-2021) of patients with ischemic stroke, HFrEF, and sinus rhythm. Time to the primary outcome of recurrent ischemic stroke, major bleeding, or death was assessed using the adjusted Cox proportional hazards model and was compared between patients treated using anticoagulation (±antiplatelet) vs. antiplatelet therapy alone after propensity score matching using an intention-to-treat (ITT) approach, with adjustment for residual measurable confounders. Sensitivity analyses included the multivariable Cox proportional hazards model using ITT and as-treated approaches without propensity score matching.

RESULTS

Of 2,974 screened patients, 217 were included in the secondary analyses, with 130 patients matched according to the propensity score for receiving anticoagulation treatment for the primary analysis, spanning 143 patient-years of follow-up. After propensity score matching, there was no significant association between anticoagulation and the primary outcome [hazard ratio (HR) 1.10, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.56-2.17]. Non-White race (HR 2.26, 95% CI: 1.16-4.41) and the presence of intracranial occlusion (HR 2.86, 95% CI: 1.40-5.83) were independently associated with the primary outcome, while hypertension was inversely associated (HR 0.42, 95% CI: 0.21-0.84). There remained no significant association between anticoagulation and the primary outcome in sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSION

In HFrEF patients with an acute stroke, there was no difference in outcomes of antithrombotic strategies. While this study was limited by non-randomized treatment allocation, the results support future trials of stroke patients with HFrEF which may randomize patients to anticoagulation or antiplatelet.

摘要

目的

关于长期抗血小板治疗与抗凝治疗对射血分数降低的缺血性中风患者预防复发性缺血性中风的益处,现有数据不足。因此,本研究旨在比较在射血分数≤40%的中风患者队列中,使用抗血小板药物与抗凝药物的纵向结局。

方法

我们回顾性分析了单中心登记数据(2015 - 2021年),这些数据来自患有缺血性中风、射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)且为窦性心律的患者。使用调整后的Cox比例风险模型评估复发性缺血性中风、大出血或死亡的主要结局发生时间,并在倾向评分匹配后,采用意向性治疗(ITT)方法,对接受抗凝治疗(±抗血小板治疗)的患者与仅接受抗血小板治疗的患者进行比较,并对残余可测量的混杂因素进行调整。敏感性分析包括使用ITT和未进行倾向评分匹配的实际治疗方法进行多变量Cox比例风险模型分析。

结果

在2974名筛查患者中,217名纳入二次分析,130名患者根据倾向评分匹配用于主要分析的接受抗凝治疗,随访时间跨度为143患者年。倾向评分匹配后,抗凝治疗与主要结局之间无显著关联[风险比(HR)1.10,95%置信区间(CI):0.56 - 2.17]。非白种人(HR 2.26,95% CI:1.16 - 4.41)和颅内闭塞的存在(HR 2.86,95% CI:1.40 - 5.83)与主要结局独立相关,而高血压与之呈负相关(HR 0.42,95% CI:0.21 - 0.84)。敏感性分析中,抗凝治疗与主要结局之间仍无显著关联。

结论

在急性中风的射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者中,抗血栓策略的结局无差异。虽然本研究受非随机治疗分配的限制,但结果支持未来对射血分数降低的心力衰竭中风患者进行试验,可将患者随机分为抗凝或抗血小板治疗组。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51ab/9797677/f5ca88fa8f8b/fneur-13-1041806-g0001.jpg

相似文献

2
Antiplatelet versus anticoagulation treatment for patients with heart failure in sinus rhythm.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Sep 15;9(9):CD003333. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003333.pub3.
4
Time Trends of Etiology, Treatment, and Long-Term Outcomes Among Patients with Left Ventricular Thrombus.
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Oct 20;24(10):298. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2410298. eCollection 2023 Oct.
5
Antithrombotic therapy after acute ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Stroke. 2014 Dec;45(12):3637-42. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.006929. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
8
9
Prestroke and Poststroke Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Results From a Nationwide Cohort.
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 May 18;1(1):e180171. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0171.
10
Meta-Analysis of Antithrombotic Strategies in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction and Sinus Rhythm.
Am J Cardiol. 2020 Jul 15;127:92-98. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.04.007. Epub 2020 Apr 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Stroke-heart syndrome: current progress and future outlook.
J Neurol. 2024 Aug;271(8):4813-4825. doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12480-4. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
2
Deciphering the Dilemma: Anticoagulation for Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF).
Cureus. 2023 Aug 10;15(8):e43279. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43279. eCollection 2023 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
Functional Recovery in Patients with Acute Stroke and Pre-Existing Disability: A Natural History Study.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2022 Aug;31(8):106508. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2022.106508. Epub 2022 May 20.
2
Acute Ischemic Stroke, Depressed Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction, and Sinus Rhythm: Prevalence and Practice Patterns.
Stroke. 2022 Jun;53(6):1883-1891. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.036706. Epub 2022 Jan 28.
3
Stroke and Thromboembolism in Patients with Heart Failure and Sinus Rhythm: A Matter of Risk Stratification?
Thromb Haemost. 2022 Jun;122(6):871-878. doi: 10.1055/a-1745-2083. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
6
Falling stroke rates during COVID-19 pandemic at a comprehensive stroke center.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Aug;29(8):104953. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.104953. Epub 2020 May 14.
9
Prevalence and Overlap of Potential Embolic Sources in Patients With Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Aug 6;8(15):e012858. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012858. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
10
Rivaroxaban With or Without Aspirin in Patients With Heart Failure and Chronic Coronary or Peripheral Artery Disease.
Circulation. 2019 Aug 13;140(7):529-537. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.039609. Epub 2019 Jun 5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验