Chan-Pérez José I, Torres-Acosta Juan F J, Ortega-Pacheco Antonio, Hernández-Cortazar Ivonne B, Cigarroa-Toledo Nohemi, Jiménez-Coello Matilde
Centro de Investigaciones Regionales Dr Hideyo Noguchi, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Avenida Itzáes, x Calle 59, Col. Centro, Mérida, Yucatán, Mexico.
Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Km 15.5 Carretera Mérida-Xmatkuil, Mérida, Yucatán, Mexico.
Curr Res Parasitol Vector Borne Dis. 2022 Feb 7;2:100081. doi: 10.1016/j.crpvbd.2022.100081. eCollection 2022.
In this study, the prevalence of infection was estimated in dogs and their owners from a rural community in Mexico using serological techniques for chronic infection cases, qPCR for acute phase cases, and a combination of both techniques to detect chronic and acute infections. Eighty-nine blood samples were collected from owners and their dogs for obtaining serum and parasite DNA. Prevalence was calculated using (i) positive cases detected in a serological test (ELISA and Western blot), (ii) positive cases detected in a qPCR test, and (iii) positive cases detected by both techniques. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were determined individually for serology, qPCR and for both techniques used simultaneously. The prevalence observed varied: for serology, 25.8% of the dogs and 7.9% of the owners were seropositive, while for qPCR 29.2% of the dogs and 10.1% of the owners were identified as positive. Combination of serological and molecular techniques resulted in a prevalence of 38.2% for dogs and 12.4% for their owners. The sensitivity, specificity and predictive values calculated for both techniques improved when both techniques were used simultaneously (sensitivity of 92.4% and specificity of 100% for infected dogs and sensitivity of 93.4% and specificity of 100% for infected owners). Combined use of serological tests and qPCR allowed identifying a greater number of positive cases in dogs and their owners. This strategy may help implement adequate and timely epidemiological surveillance of American trypanosomiasis in order to prevent the appearance of new cases of infections in endemic zones.
在本研究中,采用血清学技术检测慢性感染病例、qPCR检测急性期病例以及两种技术联合检测慢性和急性感染,对墨西哥一个农村社区的犬及其主人的感染率进行了估计。从主人及其犬只采集了89份血样,以获取血清和寄生虫DNA。感染率的计算方法如下:(i) 血清学检测(ELISA和Western印迹法)中检测到的阳性病例;(ii) qPCR检测中检测到的阳性病例;(iii) 两种技术均检测到的阳性病例。分别确定了血清学、qPCR以及同时使用两种技术时的敏感性、特异性和预测值。观察到的感染率有所不同:血清学检测方面,25.8%的犬和7.9%的主人血清呈阳性;而qPCR检测中,29.2%的犬和10.1%的主人被鉴定为阳性。血清学和分子技术联合使用时,犬的感染率为38.2%,其主人的感染率为12.4%。当同时使用两种技术时,计算出的两种技术的敏感性、特异性和预测值均有所提高(感染犬的敏感性为92.4%,特异性为100%;感染主人的敏感性为93.4%,特异性为100%)。血清学检测和qPCR联合使用能够识别出犬及其主人中更多的阳性病例。这种策略可能有助于对美洲锥虫病实施充分且及时的流行病学监测,以防止流行地区出现新的感染病例。