Bayram Muhammed, Duman Zihni Mert, Timur Barış, Yaşar Emre, Üstünışık Çiğdem Tel, Kaplan Mustafa Can, Kadiroğulları Ersin
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Istanbul Mehmet Akif Ersoy Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, 34303 Turkey.
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Cizre State Hospital, Şırnak, 72200 Turkey.
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Jan;39(1):6-13. doi: 10.1007/s12055-022-01431-1. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
Stanford type A aortic dissection (TAAD) is the most common and fatal type of dissection. An easier-to-use risk stratification may help eliminate bias in patients at high risk of dissection. The age, serum creatinine, and ejection fraction (ACEF) score is a simple risk model developed to predict the mortality risk of elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between preoperative ACEF score and operative mortality in patients with TAAD undergoing emergency surgery.
In this retrospective cohort study, 113 patients diagnosed with TAAD between January 2017 and September 2021 were evaluated. The primary endpoint was operative mortality. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed for the ACEF score, ACEF II score, and European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II. Univariate and multivariate analyses of operative mortality were performed using the logistic regression model.
Operative mortality occurred in 23 (20.4%) patients. The cutoff ACEF score was calculated as 1.1 for predicting operative mortality (area under the curve = 0.712, value = 0.002, sensitivity = 74.0%, specificity = 67.8%, likelihood ratio = 2.3). Based on the cutoff value, 46 (40.7%) patients had a high ACEF score (ACEF ≥ 1.1) and 67 (59.3%) patients had a low ACEF score (ACEF < 1.1). The high ACEF score was associated with an increased incidence of operative mortality compared with the low ACEF score (37.0% vs. 9.0%; = 0.001).
The ACEF score can be used as a useful and relatively simple tool for risk stratification before TAAD surgery. However, the ACEF score is only indicated for risk assessment and should not affect treatment.
斯坦福A型主动脉夹层(TAAD)是最常见且致命的夹层类型。一种更易于使用的风险分层方法可能有助于消除夹层高危患者中的偏差。年龄、血清肌酐和射血分数(ACEF)评分是一种为预测择期冠状动脉旁路移植手术的死亡风险而开发的简单风险模型。本研究旨在评估TAAD急诊手术患者术前ACEF评分与手术死亡率之间的关系。
在这项回顾性队列研究中,对2017年1月至2021年9月期间诊断为TAAD的113例患者进行了评估。主要终点是手术死亡率。对ACEF评分、ACEF II评分和欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统II进行了受试者操作特征分析。使用逻辑回归模型对手术死亡率进行单因素和多因素分析。
23例(20.4%)患者发生手术死亡。预测手术死亡率的ACEF评分临界值计算为1.1(曲线下面积=0.712,P值=0.002,敏感性=74.0%,特异性=67.8%,似然比=2.3)。根据临界值,46例(40.7%)患者ACEF评分高(ACEF≥1.1),67例(59.3%)患者ACEF评分低(ACEF<1.1)。与低ACEF评分相比,高ACEF评分与手术死亡率增加相关(37.0%对9.0%;P=0.001)。
ACEF评分可作为TAAD手术前风险分层的有用且相对简单的工具。然而,ACEF评分仅用于风险评估,不应影响治疗。