Suppr超能文献

年龄、肌酐和射血分数(ACEF)评分系统对斯坦福A型主动脉夹层患者手术死亡率的预测价值。

Predictive value of age, creatinine, and ejection fraction (ACEF) scoring system for operative mortality in patients with Stanford type A aortic dissection.

作者信息

Bayram Muhammed, Duman Zihni Mert, Timur Barış, Yaşar Emre, Üstünışık Çiğdem Tel, Kaplan Mustafa Can, Kadiroğulları Ersin

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Istanbul Mehmet Akif Ersoy Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, 34303 Turkey.

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Cizre State Hospital, Şırnak, 72200 Turkey.

出版信息

Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Jan;39(1):6-13. doi: 10.1007/s12055-022-01431-1. Epub 2022 Nov 23.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Stanford type A aortic dissection (TAAD) is the most common and fatal type of dissection. An easier-to-use risk stratification may help eliminate bias in patients at high risk of dissection. The age, serum creatinine, and ejection fraction (ACEF) score is a simple risk model developed to predict the mortality risk of elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between preoperative ACEF score and operative mortality in patients with TAAD undergoing emergency surgery.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, 113 patients diagnosed with TAAD between January 2017 and September 2021 were evaluated. The primary endpoint was operative mortality. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed for the ACEF score, ACEF II score, and European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II. Univariate and multivariate analyses of operative mortality were performed using the logistic regression model.

RESULTS

Operative mortality occurred in 23 (20.4%) patients. The cutoff ACEF score was calculated as 1.1 for predicting operative mortality (area under the curve = 0.712, value = 0.002, sensitivity = 74.0%, specificity = 67.8%, likelihood ratio = 2.3). Based on the cutoff value, 46 (40.7%) patients had a high ACEF score (ACEF ≥ 1.1) and 67 (59.3%) patients had a low ACEF score (ACEF < 1.1). The high ACEF score was associated with an increased incidence of operative mortality compared with the low ACEF score (37.0% vs. 9.0%;  = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The ACEF score can be used as a useful and relatively simple tool for risk stratification before TAAD surgery. However, the ACEF score is only indicated for risk assessment and should not affect treatment.

摘要

目的

斯坦福A型主动脉夹层(TAAD)是最常见且致命的夹层类型。一种更易于使用的风险分层方法可能有助于消除夹层高危患者中的偏差。年龄、血清肌酐和射血分数(ACEF)评分是一种为预测择期冠状动脉旁路移植手术的死亡风险而开发的简单风险模型。本研究旨在评估TAAD急诊手术患者术前ACEF评分与手术死亡率之间的关系。

方法

在这项回顾性队列研究中,对2017年1月至2021年9月期间诊断为TAAD的113例患者进行了评估。主要终点是手术死亡率。对ACEF评分、ACEF II评分和欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统II进行了受试者操作特征分析。使用逻辑回归模型对手术死亡率进行单因素和多因素分析。

结果

23例(20.4%)患者发生手术死亡。预测手术死亡率的ACEF评分临界值计算为1.1(曲线下面积=0.712,P值=0.002,敏感性=74.0%,特异性=67.8%,似然比=2.3)。根据临界值,46例(40.7%)患者ACEF评分高(ACEF≥1.1),67例(59.3%)患者ACEF评分低(ACEF<1.1)。与低ACEF评分相比,高ACEF评分与手术死亡率增加相关(37.0%对9.0%;P=0.001)。

结论

ACEF评分可作为TAAD手术前风险分层的有用且相对简单的工具。然而,ACEF评分仅用于风险评估,不应影响治疗。

相似文献

1
Predictive value of age, creatinine, and ejection fraction (ACEF) scoring system for operative mortality in patients with Stanford type A aortic dissection.
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Jan;39(1):6-13. doi: 10.1007/s12055-022-01431-1. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
8
Predictive value of the age, creatinine, and ejection fraction (ACEF) score in patients with acute coronary syndromes.
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Nov 1;270:7-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.05.134. Epub 2018 Jun 1.

本文引用的文献

2
A simplified acute kidney injury predictor following transcatheter aortic valve implantation: ACEF score.
Kardiol Pol. 2021;79(6):662-668. doi: 10.33963/KP.15933. Epub 2021 May 20.
3
A preoperative mortality risk assessment model for Stanford type A acute aortic dissection.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020 Dec 3;20(1):508. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01802-9.
6
Predictive ability of ACEF and ACEF II score in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the GLOBAL LEADERS study.
Int J Cardiol. 2019 Jul 1;286:43-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.02.043. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
7
Malperfusion in acute type A aortic dissection: An update from the Nordic Consortium for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Apr;157(4):1324-1333.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.10.134. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
8
9
The ACEF II Risk Score for cardiac surgery: updated but still parsimonious.
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jun 14;39(23):2183-2189. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx228.
10
Reliability of new scores in predicting perioperative mortality after mitral valve surgery.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Mar;147(3):1008-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.06.042. Epub 2013 Aug 28.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验