Keister Alexander, Vignolles-Jeong Joshua, Kreatsoulas Daniel, VanKoevering Kyle, Viljoen Stephanus, Prevedello Daniel, Grossbach Andrew J
1The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio; and.
Departments of2Neurological Surgery and.
J Neurosurg Case Lessons. 2023 Jan 2;5(1). doi: 10.3171/CASE22290.
Operative management of craniovertebral junction (CVJ) osteomyelitis has traditionally been extracranial and focused on debriding the infection. In select patients, the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) with a focus on additional resection versus debridement may be preferred. The goal of this study is to present the authors' experience with the EEA with gross or subtotal resection for the treatment of osteomyelitis at the CVJ and describe their technique in the context of the literature.
Two patients of the authors' and 6 detailed case reports in the literature were identified with a mean age of 58.9 years. Most patients (n = 5; 62.5%) underwent skull base surgery and debridement (n = 5; 62.5%). Although more common, debridement was inferior to resection in terms of neurological improvement (66.7% vs. 100.0%) postoperatively. The majority (n = 7; 87.5%) of patients underwent occipitocervical fusion.
Osteomyelitis is an exceedingly rare lesion of the CVJ. Despite the region's delicate biomechanical stability, resection of infected bone may be superior to debridement alone in terms of clinical outcome. Given how well established the safety of the EEA is to this region, further study of outcomes with resection is warranted.
颅颈交界区(CVJ)骨髓炎的手术治疗传统上是颅外手术,重点是清除感染病灶。对于部分患者,以内镜经鼻入路(EEA)并侧重于额外切除而非清创可能更为可取。本研究的目的是介绍作者采用EEA进行大体或次全切除治疗CVJ骨髓炎的经验,并结合文献描述其技术。
确定了作者的2例患者以及文献中的6例详细病例报告,平均年龄为58.9岁。大多数患者(n = 5;62.5%)接受了颅底手术和清创(n = 5;62.5%)。虽然清创更为常见,但在术后神经功能改善方面,清创不如切除(66.7%对100.0%)。大多数患者(n = 7;87.5%)接受了枕颈融合术。
骨髓炎是CVJ极为罕见的病变。尽管该区域生物力学稳定性脆弱,但就临床结果而言,切除感染骨可能优于单纯清创。鉴于EEA对该区域的安全性已得到充分证实,有必要进一步研究切除术后的结果。