Slobozhan Ivan, Brik Tymofii, Sharma Rajesh
Institute of Computer Science, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Policy Research Department, Kyiv School of Economics, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Soc Netw Anal Min. 2023;13(1):19. doi: 10.1007/s13278-022-01002-7. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
Online activism has been pivotal for anti-government protests all around the world. A lot of existing research studies how people use social media to mobilize and coordinate protests. However, some platforms offer more than one kind of medium for communication, in particular, Telegram. We found that a lot of research literature focuses on either one or another medium or sometimes merges them together. In this research, we performed a comparative analysis of three communication mediums in this platform: channels, groups, and local chats during protests in Belarus in 2020. We first collected a dataset which follows six months of protest, which allows us to study the temporal variation of online activism. We find that in Telegram, these three modes of communication are not equally important. Furthermore, they are responsible for different types of communication. For example, in groups, people discuss significant protests that occurred nationwide. In comparison, people discuss local and small demonstrations and protests in chats. Finally, Telegram channels are very distinct from local chats and channels in terms of content. Our finding suggests that future research should consider these modes of the communication independently rather than blending them.
网络行动主义对世界各地的反政府抗议活动起到了关键作用。许多现有研究探讨了人们如何利用社交媒体来动员和协调抗议活动。然而,一些平台提供了不止一种交流媒介,尤其是Telegram。我们发现,许多研究文献要么聚焦于一种媒介,要么聚焦于另一种媒介,有时还会将它们合并在一起。在本研究中,我们对该平台在2020年白俄罗斯抗议期间的三种交流媒介进行了比较分析:频道、群组和本地聊天。我们首先收集了一个涵盖六个月抗议活动的数据集,这使我们能够研究网络行动主义的时间变化。我们发现,在Telegram中,这三种交流模式的重要性并不相同。此外,它们负责不同类型的交流。例如,在群组中,人们讨论全国范围内发生的重大抗议活动。相比之下,人们在聊天中讨论当地的小型示威和抗议活动。最后,Telegram频道在内容方面与本地聊天和群组截然不同。我们的研究结果表明,未来的研究应该独立考虑这些交流模式,而不是将它们混为一谈。