Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Guangdong Engineering Research Center of Oral Restoration and Reconstruction Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Basic and Applied Research of Oral Regenerative Medicine, Affiliated Stomatology Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510182, China.
Department of Endodontics, Guangdong Engineering Research Center of Oral Restoration and Reconstruction Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Basic and Applied Research of Oral Regenerative Medicine, Affiliated Stomatology Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510182, China.
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023 Feb;124(1S):101383. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2023.101383. Epub 2023 Jan 14.
To construct a novel portable tooth sectioning guide to improve the accuracy of mandibular third molar extraction.
First, 72 samples of an identical 3D-printed double-rooted mandibular third molar were obtained and used in 36 mandibular models. Three different models were constructed (class B vertical, mesial, and horizontal impaction). Then, we made the tooth sectioning guides. mimicking clinical tooth sectioning conditions, two dental surgeons with different levels of experience used both the digital guided technique and the traditional empirical technique during surgery. Accuracy indicators, including apical deviation and angle deviation, were analyzed and compared on postoperative cone-beam computed tomographic scanning and via image reconstruction. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed. A p-value of 0.05 indicated statistically significant differences among the groups.
Overall, the mean apical deviation of experienced/inexperienced operators using the conventional section technique was 1.120 mm (0.7 mm, 2.3 mm) and 1.54± 0.84 mm, respectively. Correspondingly, the mean apical deviation under the guided section technique was 0.28 mm (0.2 mm, 0.4 mm) and 0.32±0.16 mm, respectively. The mean angle deviations of experienced/inexperienced operators under the conventional section technique were 8.015° (3.5°, 10.5°) and 6.570° (5.5°, 14.9°). Correspondingly, the mean apical deviation using the guided section technique was 1.880° (0.4°, 2.9°) and 1.470° (0.7°, 3.1°), respectively. The conventional and guided techniques were significantly different (P < 0.001).
In the digital guide technique, sectioning is more predictable and accurate, and the success of the operation is achievable with different proficiencies among dental surgeons.
This technique will not only reduce the difficulty of tooth extraction but also reduce the risk of damage to the surrounding soft and hard tissues, especially damage to the inferior alveolar nerve.
构建一种新型便携式牙切片引导器,以提高下颌第三磨牙拔除的准确性。
首先,获得 72 个相同的 3D 打印双根下颌第三磨牙样本,并将其用于 36 个下颌模型中。构建了三种不同的模型(B 类垂直、近中、水平阻生)。然后,制作牙切片引导器。在模拟临床牙切片条件下,两名经验水平不同的牙医在手术中同时使用数字引导技术和传统经验技术。在术后锥形束计算机断层扫描和图像重建上分析和比较了包括根尖偏差和角度偏差在内的准确性指标。进行了描述性统计分析。p 值<0.05 表示组间有统计学差异。
总体而言,经验丰富/经验不足的操作人员使用传统切片技术的平均根尖偏差分别为 1.120mm(0.7mm,2.3mm)和 1.54±0.84mm,相应地,引导切片技术下的平均根尖偏差为 0.28mm(0.2mm,0.4mm)和 0.32±0.16mm。经验丰富/经验不足的操作人员在传统切片技术下的平均角度偏差分别为 8.015°(3.5°,10.5°)和 6.570°(5.5°,14.9°)。相应地,引导切片技术下的平均根尖偏差为 1.880°(0.4°,2.9°)和 1.470°(0.7°,3.1°)。传统技术和引导技术有显著差异(P<0.001)。
在数字引导技术中,切片更具可预测性和准确性,并且不同牙医的技能水平都能实现手术的成功。
该技术不仅降低了拔牙的难度,而且降低了对周围软硬组织,特别是对下牙槽神经损伤的风险。