Suppr超能文献

静脉注射维奈托克 14 天的持续时间更短,在治疗急性髓系白血病方面具有相同的疗效和更好的安全性。

Shorter duration of venetoclax administration to 14 days has same efficacy and better safety profile in treatment of acute myeloid leukemia.

机构信息

Kushiro Rosai Hospital, Kushiro, Hokkaido, Japan.

出版信息

Ann Hematol. 2023 Mar;102(3):541-546. doi: 10.1007/s00277-023-05102-y. Epub 2023 Jan 16.

Abstract

Venetoclax (VEN) is now widely used in the treatment of acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) in elderly patients who are not eligible for intensive remission induction therapy. Prolonged myelosuppression, increased incidence of infection, and long duration of hospital stay were major concerns for VEN treatment cases, and we thought that shortening the duration of VEN administration during induction therapy might solve these problems. Thirteen newly diagnosed AML patients who underwent VEN+azacitidine (AZA) induction therapy from March 2021 to June 2022 at Kushiro Rosai Hospital were analyzed retrospectively. The median age was 79 (range, 68-86) years, and 8 of the patients (61.5%) were classified as high risk according to the ELN 2017 risk stratification. Eight patients received VEN for 14 days (VEN14 group), and 5 patients received VEN for 28 days (VEN28 group). The composite complete remission (CRc) rate was 76.9% in total, and the CRc rates in the VEN14 and VEN28 groups were almost the same (75.0% and 80.0%, respectively). The median overall survival (OS) was not reached in the VEN14 group and was 254 days in the VEN28 group. The median event-free survival (EFS) was not reached in the VEN14 group and was 178 days in the VEN28 group. The VEN14 group might have a possibility to reduce febrile neutropenia (37.5% vs. 80%) and reduce the duration of hospital stay (median, 21.5 vs. 31 days) compared with the VEN28 group. VEN14 produced the same CRc rate and survival rate, safer profile, and shorter duration of hospital stay than VEN28.

摘要

维奈托克(VEN)现已广泛用于不适合强化缓解诱导治疗的老年急性髓系白血病(AML)患者的治疗。延长的骨髓抑制、感染发生率增加和住院时间延长是 VEN 治疗病例的主要关注点,我们认为缩短诱导治疗期间 VEN 给药的持续时间可能会解决这些问题。我们回顾性分析了 2021 年 3 月至 2022 年 6 月在钏路市立 Rosa 医院接受 VEN+阿扎胞苷(AZA)诱导治疗的 13 例新诊断 AML 患者。中位年龄为 79 岁(范围,68-86 岁),根据 ELN 2017 风险分层,8 例患者(61.5%)为高危。8 例患者接受 VEN 治疗 14 天(VEN14 组),5 例患者接受 VEN 治疗 28 天(VEN28 组)。总复合完全缓解(CRc)率为 76.9%,VEN14 组和 VEN28 组的 CRc 率几乎相同(分别为 75.0%和 80.0%)。VEN14 组中位总生存期(OS)未达到,而 VEN28 组为 254 天。VEN14 组中位无事件生存期(EFS)未达到,而 VEN28 组为 178 天。与 VEN28 组相比,VEN14 组可能有降低发热性中性粒细胞减少症(37.5% vs. 80%)和缩短住院时间(中位 21.5 天 vs. 31 天)的可能性。与 VEN28 相比,VEN14 产生相同的 CRc 率和生存率、更安全的特征以及更短的住院时间。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a23b/9977697/b415c63c5da1/277_2023_5102_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验