HPI Institute, Berlin, Germany.
University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Jan 16;21(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00948-6.
Purely technical interventions aimed at enhancing evidence-informed decision-making (EIDM) have rarely translated into organizational institutionalization or systems change. A panel of four presentations at the Health Systems Global 2020 conference provides a basis for inference about contextual factors that influence the establishment and sustainability of institutional platforms to support EIDM. These cases include local structures such as citizen panels in Uganda, regional knowledge translation structures such as the West African Health Organization, global multilateral initiatives such as the "One Health" Quadrapartite and regional public health networks in South-East Asia. They point to the importance of political economy as well as technical capability determinants of evidence uptake and utilization at institutional, organizational and individual levels. The cases also lend support to evidence that third-party (broker and intermediary) supportive institutions can facilitate EIDM processes. The involvement of third-party supranational organizations, however, poses challenges in terms of legitimacy and accountability.
纯粹旨在增强循证决策(EIDM)的技术干预措施很少转化为组织制度化或系统变革。在 2020 年全球卫生系统会议上的一个四人小组介绍提供了一个推理的基础,以了解影响支持 EIDM 的机构平台的建立和可持续性的背景因素。这些案例包括乌干达的公民小组等地方结构、西非卫生组织等区域知识转化结构、“同一健康”四方等全球多边倡议以及东南亚区域公共卫生网络。它们指出了政治经济以及技术能力在机构、组织和个人层面上对证据的吸收和利用的决定因素的重要性。这些案例也为证据提供了支持,即第三方(经纪人及中介机构)支持性机构可以促进 EIDM 进程。然而,第三方超国家组织的参与在合法性和问责制方面带来了挑战。